Jump to content

The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II: The Tele-genik Photo Lens!


Recommended Posts

  • Contributor
danielm

 

P5190377.jpeg

It is a kind of bizarre to be a faithful user of the Micro Four Third image sensor format (MFT) with the strong will to have the most compact camera body-lens combination and finally choose a super telephoto zoom that the final physical length extension remind the days of the 35mm film-analog era and their big bazooka telephoto optics.

The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II zoom lens is a beast compare to the usual standard zoom lenses associated with the MFT format system (let’s put the Pro optic line-up aside in that case) which are presented into a small-sized dimensions. But, in fact, the Olympus ED 75-300mm II is real compact tele-zoom lens considering its high magnification, from 3X to 12X compare to the standard focal length in MFT format (25mm). To get there, the "made in Japan" optic is doted of a small maximum variable aperture of F4.8 to F6.7 which is the slowest maximum aperture for a telephoto lens that I have ever own! The front filter accessory diameter is 58mm and the lens weight is only 423g.
 
P4270286.jpeg

A large focal length control ring with a good resistance when turning it allows the zoom framing adjustment. The focusing ring for its part is small and offers no real resistance with a "free" rolling characteristic and its reactivity is, in my sense, too much slow for changing the focusing point. Coupled with a compact Micro Four Third camera body, your left hand will support mainly the weight of the lens-body combination as it was the case during the past age of the 35mm analog-film era. There may be a bit an adaptation to do here if you are accustomed to use smaller lenses.

With a modest variable maximum aperture such as the Olympus ED 75-300mm II have, we can say that you have a good safety in term of deep of field for focusing your subject which a good thing when you are targeting fast moving subjects such as animals or birds for example. Foreground and background have a pleasant defocusing degradation (Bokeh). The Olympus ED 75-300mm II can be also an interesting optic to do portrait assuming that your distance between you and your subject will be further than the usual way to do this kind of photographic project. 

A long minimal focusing distance of almost 3 feet (0,9 m) is characterizing the Olympus ED 75-300mm II but this is not preventing you to do picture of smaller objects. In any case, this kind of distance allow you to not disturb the subject, its spatial arrangement and its light distribution. 
 
P5160260.jpeg

Stabilization is a must! 
At first, telephoto lenses can be hard to get satisfactory picture results. Partly because of the necessity to be stable when holding the camera boy-lens combination especially considering the greater magnification proposed by any tele-lens. Internal camera sensor stabilization (IBIS) is a direct answer to this problem although some other lens model offers an optical stabilization (which proclaim to be more efficient for super telephoto lenses). 

There is also the haze (air) effect that is more evident with the compression perspective generated by telephoto lenses. By configuring certain picture taking factors such as the exposure and the contrast, or by a post-editing fine tuning, you can counteract this inevitable fact of life.

Check your shutter speed and follow the subject travel (Panning). 
Because of its seducing high magnification, the Olympus D 75-300mm II is an easy pick to isolate your subject from its surrounding but there is a catch with such long telephoto lenses. Even with a good camera sensor stabilization system, you may have to select a faster shutter speedway be at least equal to the focal length as we do during the film analog era. In doing so, you will probably open your telephoto optic to its maximum aperture and observe a very shallow deep of field. Trying to photograph moving subjects can be another kind of challenge because of the limited maximum aperture of the Olympus ED 75-300mm II. Panning your main subject, the same direction of its movement travel can be an answer but it requires a good knowledge of the subject movement behavior, practice of the technique, persistence and ... some luck of your side!
 
P4190180.jpeg

Tripod and monopod limitations. 
The Olympus ED 75-300mm II is not really a tripod (or monopod) intended lens. Although it is possible to secure your camera body with such accessories, the follow-up of your main subject can be awkward and the none-equilibrated camera-lens combination might stress your camera tripod base too much in certain case. So, you may adapt the way you are holding the camera-lens combo by using the palm your left hand as a plateau and your elbow can lean on a more stable base. In the past, the bean bags were very popular among photographers at a time that the "pro" telephoto lenses have not any provision to be screw alone on a tripod (such as the Olympus ED 40-150mm F2.8 Pro has).
 
P5190352.jpeg

The Olympus ED 75-300mm II is surely a real birder optic considering its superlative magnification. That goes also for the animal photographers. If you are using a good picture taking technique, the results can be outstanding (in regard of the price level of this lens model). If you like to use super zoom compact camera models with fix lens, the quality gain difference will be very significant. 

And yes, you can do portrait with the Olympus ED 75-300mm II providing you got the space you do it properly and that your subject doesn't need constant coaching. 

If you are a Micro Four Third format photographer and you are using an Olympus camera model*, the Olympus ED 75-300mm II can be a valuable long telephoto optic solution. If you like to be on the move without transporting large and heavy photo gear which is, in a way, the basic essence of the MFT format, the Olympus ED 75-300mm II merits a good consideration. Its design limitations (small maximum aperture, no tripod collar provision, loose focusing ring) are compensated by its optical performances and to get marginally better you will have to spend a lot of additional money on your budget.  

The more you will experiment the Olympus ED 75-300mm II, the better you will appreciate it for its long telephoto perspective. By using a good picture taking technique, this tele-genik photo lens will seduce you further than you can think of.
 
                                                   

* The same logic can be applied for the Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4-5.6 II lens for the MFT Panasonic Lumix camera models. See this previous post.
  • Like 1

A trace of light that survive a little further than the actual moment of flash.

photodanielm.blogspot.com

Daniel M on Fliickr

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugh_3170

    4

  • danielm

    3

  • Dallas

    2

  • PFrank

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I have had and used all three lenses on various E-M1 versions.  The 75-300 can produce very good images with good technique and especially in good light.  The PL 100-400 is an excellent lens (in spite

It is a kind of bizarre to be a faithful user of the Micro Four Third image sensor format (MFT) with the strong will to have the most compact camera body-lens combination and finally choose a super te

Hugh, some advice if you are planning on getting a telephoto lens for your Olympus, try and stick with Olympus lenses that have IS built in. If you use the IS + IBIS combo the ability to hand hold lon

Posted Images

Hugh_3170
Posted (edited)

Another helpful write-up.  Thank you.

 

Does the length of this lens extend as it is zoomed out to the longer focal lengths?

Edited by Hugh_3170
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
danielm
7 hours ago, Hugh_3170 said:

Another helpful wrire-up.  Thank you.

 

Does the length of this lens extend as it is zoomed out to the longer focal lengths?

Thank you! Yes, the Olympus ED 75-300mm II does extend at its longer focal lengths. Here is an illustration that has been prepared for the post but not used: P5190385.thumb.jpeg.d7c37bce0c21988c93c9fdcb7badc860.jpeg

A trace of light that survive a little further than the actual moment of flash.

photodanielm.blogspot.com

Daniel M on Fliickr

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hugh_3170

Thank you Daniel. 

 

I am in the market for a longer lens for my OM1.  I am looking at this lens and also the Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3, although the latter is in a much higher price range.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Administrators
Dallas

Hugh, some advice if you are planning on getting a telephoto lens for your Olympus, try and stick with Olympus lenses that have IS built in. If you use the IS + IBIS combo the ability to hand hold long exposures at long focal lengths will astonish you. Unfortunately as soon as you cross over the MFT brands you lose the ability to combine them. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
danielm
Posted (edited)
On 28/05/2021 at 05:50, Hugh_3170 said:

Thank you Daniel. 

 

I am in the market for a longer lens for my OM1.  I am looking at this lens and also the Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3, although the latter is in a much higher price range.

Hi Hugh,
Since I have never try the Panasonic Leica DG 100-400mm lens, it is difficult to make a point of comparaison but, for sure, the Pana Leica 100-400mm is a better built product to withstand a more intensive use in more adverse contextual conditions. Furthermore the lens model is doted with a tripod accessory mount that offers a better camera body-lens equilibrium and a far more ability to get stable panning for moving subject follow-up. 
To add on the Dallas remark, Olympus does offer its own equivalent in term of characteristics and selling price level (!) with their M.Zuiko ED 100-400mm F5-6.3 IS.
Hope those short thoughts can help you.
Have a good day, daniel m

Edited by danielm
  • Like 1

A trace of light that survive a little further than the actual moment of flash.

photodanielm.blogspot.com

Daniel M on Fliickr

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hugh_3170

Thank you Dallas  -  a good point with respect to the combining of the two stabilisation systems. 

 

In Australia, the Olympus 100-400mm is even dearer than the Panasonic one, but it may well be worth the extra in light of what you have said.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hugh_3170

Thank you Daniel - clearly I have some more homework ahead of me! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Administrators
Dallas
3 hours ago, Hugh_3170 said:

but it may well be worth the extra in light of what you have said

 

I think so. I had this 75-300mm and I didn't fall in love with it, but at the time it was the only game in town for MFT that offered that range, so I took it with me on my first safari to Botswana. It did OK, but when the light dropped it wasn't very usable. 

 

On the last Sabi Sabi safari I had borrowed the E-M1X and 300mm f/4.0 PRO from Olympus SA and I just couldn't get over the effect of using both stabilisation methods in unison. For birding I don't think you can buy better equipment in any format. Add the Pro Capture feature and it's like shooting fish in a barrel. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
PFrank

I have had and used all three lenses on various E-M1 versions.  The 75-300 can produce very good images with good technique and especially in good light.  The PL 100-400 is an excellent lens (in spite of some reports of tight lens mounts and stiff zoom ring).  I never found the incompatible IS systems to be a problem; again technique helps a lot.  I now have an E-M1 MkIII and acquired the Olympus 100-400 a few weeks ago.  It is bigger and heavier and a bit slower than the PL 100-400 but I do not have a problem with that.  The combined body and lens IS is not as good as the Olympus Pro lenses but it is still better than nothing.  Again, technique can make a difference.  So far, it has proven to be an excellent lens, at least for my use.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • danielm
      By danielm
      When it comes time to do birds photography, all eyes are turn on the telephoto lens model you are choosing to realize your pictures. And it is also obvious that such an optic has to give you at least a increase magnification of 10 times compare to your normal eyesight. That means for the Micro Four Third format something like a 250mm (10 X 25mm). But you can manage to install a more bird friendly and nearer (!) environment, with some bird tables (feeders) or baths that will allow you to be nearer of them as it is my case with the advantage to get a more predictable arrangement and a better rate of success.

      Following my introduction of the use of the Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II telephoto zoom lens, it is my pleasure to offer you other interesting results in bird photography.                                                                                 Bird No.1: White-breasted nuthatch; Bird No.2: American Goldfinch (Male); Bird No.3 Blue Jay; Bird No.4: Evening grosbeak(Female)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By visiting this website you are agreeing to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy & Guidelines.