Noct f/0.95 x Noct f/1.2 x 50mm f/1.2 @ f/1.2

[atpaula]

Nothing much to do at home in this quarentine.

One Z6 body for the Noct f/0.95 and another for the other two lenses. Both have the same settings.

No tripod. I approached to the subject a little for the 50mm.

 

 

 

[Tord55]

The last one is definitely more pleasing to my old eyes!

 

Staying mostly indoors we have at least a balcony where we feed the birds so we get a few shots of sparrows, tits, and gulls.

 

My Sigma 135/1.8 Art has proven to be a wonderful lens under these ciscumstances!

 

All the best,

 

Tord

[mjcmt]

They all are similar w/ #3 looking the most 3D. Brightness seems to be the biggest difference. Are they processed the same?

[atpaula]

Yes, they were processed the same way.

[CarreraS]

Not much DoF to play with, Aguinaldo !

 

The light source top middle varies 'widely', the beast looks best, but are we testing IBIS native vs adapted lenses here, or were your elbows on a table with no IBIS ?

 

My collection of 1.4 AF-S lenses has taken a big hit on resale value, so when I have a need I'll adapt them and see how they go, but the 24-70 2.8 S has seem almost all the action lately.

 

cheers, Maurice

[atpaula]

Elbows on the ground and no ibis.