Dallas

The Brief Brief

3 posts in this topic

"We'd like you to take a few photos of the artist with her work for an exhibition she's putting on." 

 

That's it. That's all I got from the publicist. The artist in question also happens to be a client of mine who's work I have photographed for use online. The original idea was for her to come to my studio so that while I was photographing her most recent pieces for this exhibition I could also squeeze in a few shots of her with the work. I knew that wouldn't work at all for two reasons, firstly my studio is a photography studio and there is no context between it and the art works. Secondly I couldn't think of anything creative to do here that could even remotely incorporate both the works and the artist. 

 

So, plan B was to do the shoot at her studio which conveniently happens to be about 3km from my house. Add to that the fact that her studio is a much kinder place to shoot as it has been designed with a skylight smack bang in the centre giving the room some wonderful natural light. It didn't help that it was an overcast day, but I had a plan for that in the form of a couple of speedlights. 

 

I placed Bernice on one corner of the table and used a wide angle to give some prominence to the drawings in the foreground. The test shot without her looked like this. 

 

P1100003.jpg

 

With the two speedlights firing into the ceiling it got much nicer with soft light. I also had her turn on her studio overhead lighting which contains daylight balanced tubes. This is what we got. 

 

P1100012.jpg

 

She was a little small in this shot so we tried something else from the same position.

 

P1100015.jpg

 

And then for good measure from a different angle with the French doors to the outside garden opened. 

 

P1100025.jpg

 

Everybody was happy with the results. 

 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Armando. The smaller drawings are quite interesting as they bleed through the paper so they are kind of reversal figures too. They are being mounted in Perspex so that they can be viewed from both sides.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Dallas
      A few days ago azrocketman (Tim) posted a link to some rather scary photos taken by a conflict photographer/correspondent from the Global Post named Tracy Shelton (link reposted here). The images show a group of Syrian opposition forces involved in the conflict there being bombed by shells from a government forces tank that was advancing on them. Some pretty chance timing of the photos shows the moments immediately preceding and during a shell impacting the group of men. Intense stuff.
      This got me thinking once again about the importance of conflict photography versus the personal motivations of photographers who are involved in this genre of reporting. I sometimes try to put myself in their position and imagine what must motivate them to want to document the very lowest form of human contact. Is it a personal quest for the media spotlight or are the motivations purely aimed at exposing the evils of war?
      If it’s a case of the latter, will photos like those taken by Tracy Shelton in Syria do anything to bring about the end of the conflict there? What purpose do they really serve if not for that? Should we be praising photographers for showing us these horrors?
      Conflict photography has been around for as long as the camera has, yet in spite of all the exposures we have seen of mankind’s lowest moments over the last century, nothing visual seems to be strong enough to impact the willingness we as a species have to simply obliterate group after group of people from the face of the earth in our senseless wars.
      I question therefore whether this type of photography is relevant to the advancement of mankind or is it simply just a case of photographers and filmmakers hoping to exploit these moments for their own gain?
      I love news imagery, but my thinking these days is that images of the type taken by Tracy Shelton have a strong cynical flavour to them.
      What’s your opinion?