Jump to content

Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS

Recommended Posts

If you have used this lens, let others know what you thought of it by rating (and/or) reviewing it in this thread.

We will keep the thread as relevant as we can, so expect off-topic entries to be removed.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only had the Fuji XF 55-200 for a few days.  In that short time however I've concluded that for me it's a keeper.  For comparison in the mirrorless world, I've also owned the Sony 55-210 E mount, and used it on both NEX-5N and NEX-7 bodies.  In a nutshell, in my opinion the Fuji is the better lens, and by a good margin at that.  Here are points of comparison:


Fuji 55-200 pros:

Much better optically than the Sony E mount 55-210.  Not that the Sony is an awful lens, however it suffers from more CA and other issues, more distortion, and noticeably less contrast than the Fuji.  The Fuji is an excellent performer even wide open, which is more than can be said of the Sony.

The Fuji build quality is really in a different league than the Sony.  By comparison, the Sony feels decidedly less expensive.  Which makes sense as the Fuji is about twice the cost of the Sony in the U.S.

The Fuji focuses faster and more accurately than the Sony did on either of my NEX bodies.  Really, for all the griping about Fuji's AF, even the NEX-7 did not focus as well with their 55-210.  I have not tried a NEX-6, so cannot speak to that one.

The Fuji 55-200 is slightly faster than the Sony 55-210 (f/3.5 vs f/4.5 on the 55mm end).


Sony E 55-210 pros:

The Sony lens is less expensive than the Fuji XF 55-200.  However, at $700 in the U.S., I really don't think the Fuji lens is priced out of line, especially given the quality of the product.

The Sony lens is also less weight than the Fuji lens, and is smaller diameter also.  Again, the Fuji is both faster and better quality than the Sony, so I suppose that's the trade-off.


A few samples - no award winners, but I had fun.  Hope some of you may find these helpful.  :P


At 55mm



At 200mm



At 181mm, in a tent during a concert.  I had trouble getting a clear shot of that hair - too many people!



At 200mm, slightly cropped



At 148.5mm



Not well executed, but shows at 200mm you can get nice OOF areas


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only just received mine, but even after a few familiarization shots I can tell that I'm going to love using this lens. Bigger than it looks in photographs, but not so big as to be cumbersome, it is about the same weight as my venerable 200/4 AI-s Nikkor prime, and about an inch longer at full 200mm extension than is the AI-s lens when focused at infinity. They've also endowed it with a good long round lens shade which offers a world of protection, fits very snugly and really does the job of keeping the sun out unless almost pointing directly at it.


Comparing it to my last Nikkor zooms, I reckon the thing is an absolute bargain for the quality of the build. As mnscott has already shown above, the OOF background bokeh is really rendered well, with no apparent double imaging that I've yet noticed and which seems to be common in so many longer OIS/VR lenses.


$700-odd spent very well, as far as I'm concerned - although this didn't cost me anything in cash, for both it and the 18-55 came courtesy of cleaning out my lens shelf of old AF-D Nikkors and other bits and pieces that I hadn't used for years :) .

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlike a new Nikkor zoom it appears that despite the whining about Fuji's slow AF focus that Fuji at least makes cameras and lenses which don't need calibrating or menu adjustments to get their lenses focusing exactly where the focus bracket is placed. My little spin yesterday afternoon to have my arse frozen off on the bleak copse that is the Red Hill Cemetery at Bushy Park proved that the AF hits the mark at any focal length or distance I chose, just as it did with the 18-55 and with both the 35mm and 14mm primes. There was some hunting when I tried to focusa on distant mountains under heavy overcast (very flat contrast), but a quick flick of the MF lever on the camera with my left index finger while pressing the command wheel with my right thumb for 10X viewfinder magnification and turning the wonderfully smooth and well damped focus ring with left hand again soon had precise focus attained.


Sharpness is excellent, perhaps only slightly soft at the long end on a distant shot (but that could also be movement even with OIS engaged - one really notices hand-held wobble out at 200mm with this lightweight setup), so I'll investigate this next time out, but in all other cases the OIS worked flawlessly to get sharp shots.


So, just for reference (light as flat as a tack, so very low contrast.... these were all shot at 200mm, hand held, OIS on, ISO 800 and processed in LightZone 4.0)


AF is bang on (1/350 f/5.6):



Pulling in detail over 1km away:

(whole frame) 1/480, f/5.6



(100% of above, click on "Save" for proper render, thumbnail has messed with sharpness):



Closeup - AF spot-on again, bokeh (!) 1/140, f/8



Only further comment about Bokeh - it's rougher in foreground OOF areas compared with the smooth background in the preferable tradeoff in design, and the shot of the graves in the BG isn't rough bokeh but the writing doubling up on being thrown out of focus.


It's not a prime lens in performance by any means, but it isn't overly hampered by the slow f/4.8 long end as the OIS works extremely well and doesn't seem to have any deleterious effect on background bokeh. Being winter here the birds have all headed north, but hopefully this lens will get me some nice shots of my resident Superb Blue Fairy Wrens when they get back from vacation.

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm already juggling finances for the 10-24 when it comes out, given the quality/price ratio of the two zoom lenses so far when compared to the money I was used to paying for Nikon zooms.


Also a 23/1.4. 56/1.4 and a second body when the X-Pros appears and I'm done. Thinking about getting my almost disused X-100 converted to IR as well.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took a few shots with the 55-200 yesterday at a local annual car show.  I'm very pleased with the results.  Not only is it very sharp, but I found hand holding quite comfortable.  It balances nicely, which makes for a very stable shooting platform.  Reminds my of my much loved Nikkor 300 f/4 AF-S on a FF dslr in that respect.  Nowhere near as bulky, though.  :)


The 55-200 proved to be very useful for candids.  Here are a few, starting with the proud owners of a very colorful vintage truck:




The first aid crew was wandering the grounds.




A whole family of sunburn victims sat down beside my son and me.



This kid was really getting into racing some model cars:



This young man seemed unable to believe what he was hearing.  Shot into late day sun - very strong back lighting!



Another in the same late day sun.  This one is slightly cropped:



After a double-take or two, I realized the little "kid" is a prop.  The woman on the left was real, though.




This one is plenty sharp, and shot at a shutter speed that probably shouldn't have worked well (1/105 sec at 148.5mm).


Edited by mnscott

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

 - HEADS UP -  well that was short and sweet, the front lens block (the bit that extends when zooming) came loose yesterday. The lens is toast - keeps on asking to switch the camera off and on again (pity that was one of the standard funny lines from the TV show "The IT Crowd - this isn't bloody funny at all!).


First I noticed was that the lens had fully extended on its own after having been carried in its usual backward-facing position at my right hip when attached to the camera. When I tried to zoom it back to 55mm it jammed at about 2/3 retracted. Instinctively I checked the front tube for tightness and it was flopping laterally very easily, like one of the helicoid pins had fallen out or broken.


I say emphatically that the lens was NOT bumped or dropped in any way - the position it is carried in when on camera makes that impossible unless I'm walking backwards or the strap disconnects at both ends at the same time, neither of which happened, and most times it has been carried off-camera in a very secure LowePro technical vest pouch anyway.

I can do without this totally unexpected thing happening - I'm now forced to use manual focus Nikon AI-s lenses at an event tomorrow which will have many people moving in a crowd situation, plus after many years of dealing with Nikon I am also apprehensive that I'm in for the same sort of accusations of rough handling that Nikon are famous for throwing at people with failed equipment. I hope Fuji are more accommodating, at least their form so far has been more customer orientated.


Until I get confirmation of the reason for failure, take kid-gloves care of your 55-200 - it might not be constructed quite as well as it appears.

Edited by Alan

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is truly sad news. I hope that you get a quick repair or replacement. Also, I hope that this is an isolated occurence or that will be even sadder. That worries me a bit as this was going to be my next lens. Maybe I'll get the 14mm lens instead and wait for manufacturing to get things smoothed out.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sad indeed - completely rattled my faith in Fuji that this could happen. Seriously debating with myself at the moment if I can really put all my eggs in the Fuji basket, I can't afford to have unreliable gear. Unfortunately the D3s is gone now, but I think my 24-120 hasn't sold yet so maybe a panic-driven purchase of a D7100 & 10-24 lens along with the return of my 24-120 will at least give me an AF-capable alternative in cases like this.


I was kinda hoping that an X-Pros would be the next body, I never contemplated a lens failure such as this which has never happened to me before (physical damage, yes, but I have insurance for that and if I drop a lens it's my own stupid fault). I've always stressed more over having backup bodies....

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alan, the failure of this new Fuji zoom lens does not surprise me.


I am rough on lens (climbing, hiking, camping, etc.).  Over 40 years, the only lenses I've had malfunction were zoom lenses.  I've never had any type of failure of a prime lens.


I have not owned a zoom lens for years. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've owned both zooms and primes for years in several different format sizes, the only failures were both zooms and caused by that dead stupid Manfrotto hex-plate failing to properly seat in the hex socket of the tripod head, with the camera falling and hitting the ground (once) and carpet (once) as a result, both times dislodging the innards. This lens was not bumped, hit, dropped or in any way abused other than extremely gentle normal handling (when I say gentle, I refer to the actual conditions - hand-held, good weather, no moisture, outdoors with no hard surfaces to bump into) so it couldn't even have been an unnoticed bump.


I'm really hoping that this was just a one-off slip-up with whoever was screwing the thing together at the factory, but with only a couple of hundred shots under its belt this has not reassured me that the next one won't also fail. Like I say, I hate unreliable equipment, even worse I hate worrying about the possibility of failure. In this case I just thought I'd have a final run through of the lens before tomorrows job, and just as well I did - I would not have had my Nikkor primes with me as I will now be sure to take tomorrow. Manual focus on single focal length lenses for the candid long shots of moving people will really add workload, though.


When I do my forest photography (as is my major pursuit) I only ever take primes with me anyhow - I got the Fuji zooms specifically for the sort of people/events photography I have to do tomorrow, and it really pisses me off that I never even got to use the lens once for work - all the shots taken so far were simply familiarization exercises to get used to the lens' behaviour.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never had a lens failure before, knock on wood. Our circumstances may vary however. Alan, while this hopefully is an isolated instance, it should really never happen.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least I'll have my equipment dealer on side due to the sheer volume of stuff I've bought from him over the years. I'll definitely be cashing in on the loyalty points in getting this sorted ASAP.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several reports now starting to appear on Fuji X forums about exactly the same problem that I experienced. I'll put it down to one worker in the assembly line not tightening something up correctly whilst others did. Luck of the draw if you've got a dodgy one, but no problem with Fuji replacing the lens reported elsewhere either. I guess the intermittent likelihood of getting one from the incorrectly fastened lot don't warrant a full recall, but Fuji's voluntary replacement without question is to be lauded in light of the response likely from other manufacturers who seem to magically produce a mark or two indicating "rough usage" rather than just 'fessing up to faulty manufacture.

The replacement they sent me felt totally different in zooming - the ring was both tighter and smoother in function than the initial lens, something that has also been reported by others with the same lens problem after their replacement arrived.


Top marks to Fuji for excellent customer service.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the heads-up Alan,


I'll check the zoom action before buying one later this year. Very useful hint.

Glad your tele is working as it should now.

Regards, Daniel

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally managed to take the replacement lens into town today and shoot a few frames to make sure everything is OK, and will therefore confirm that my previous observations about the somewhat extraordinary OIS implementation was no aberration - it really is extraordinary.


Holding the camera vertically ( I have no extra grip fitted, so this is the least steady way to hold the camera), every frame I shot was not only bang on the focus point using the AF, but even at the full 200mm extension shooting at 1/140sec @f/6.4 @ISO 800, every frame was sharp with no shake. I always thought "meh" about Nikon's VR - all the lenses I had with that never convinced me that it was much help at all - has just been confirmed as a correct "meh" by the way Fuji's OIS keeps things steady.


I thought this sign to a market offered some interesting options so I took it as described above (click for size):




Not an exciting shot, even if slightly humorous, but note there's a little penny farthing on the top of the Mart sign, and for those who would pixel peek at a 100% section of the LightZone processed file...


For a pro-am zoom lens that cost only $895, hand held at 300mm FX equiv AOV, not only is the accuracy in AF focus point incredible, but that OIS is just amazing. It does, however, seem to mess a bit with the beautiful bokeh of un-OISed shots I've taken.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 55-200mm is indeed a sharp keeper - congratulations Alan.

I'm really tempted to try it on an airshow in October if I can find one. They're not readily available in Switzerland yet.

Regards, Daniel

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every time I use mine I am once again amazed at what a good job it does. Fortunately, it is still holding together mechanically. That's more than can be said for the transmission in my motorcycle.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the reviews in this thread and the shots I've seen elsewhere here on FZ this lens has been on my wish list for a while. Two months ago when the prices dropped I finally bought one.


I can confirm the great IQ described here but what surprises me the most is the effectiveness of the OIS. I also have the Fujinon 18-55 with OIS and I know the value of the OIS but being able to shoot handheld (with a little support) at long focal lengths at around 1/30s and get keepers is a very nice surprise.


Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to use the lens much yet because I've had issues with what I believe to be a centering defect - Fuji is currently looking into the issue and as usual they've provided great support.


A few samples from a local church i dim light.


The short end - @55mm, f5.6 and 1/13s


In the following shots at longer focal lengths I was sitting at a chair to get a bit of extra support.


At the longer end - @155mm, f5.6 and 1/25s


And a little longer - @173mm, f5.6 and 1/20s


Almost at the longest end - @190mm, f5.6 and 1/30

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the new 50-140/2.8 now released, I did give thought to swapping and taking a loss both at the longer end and financially, but quickly came to the conclusion that the 55-200 is so good despite its slower speed that I simply could not justify losing the extra 60mm in exchange for WR and a constant f/2.8, and keep my money at the same time.


I'll also go so far as to say that the 55-200 has a rather distinct visual character to its images - I would likely have guessed that these shots were taken with it even without them having been identified as such.\


Plus, as noted, the OIS is simply superb in this lens, and makes a complete nonsense of the old "twice the shutter speed of the focal length" rule to avoid camera shake during exposure.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is a very good lens.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By Mike G
      The lenshood you see in this photo is a replacement for the Fuji offering that I don’t like.
      It is solid aluminium and a 52mm screw thread, the cost of this hood shipped from China including P&P ordered though Amazon was £2.63, hence my use of the word bargain. 
    • By Alan7140
      Fuji continues with its updates - new AF tracking algorithm, and compatibility with the new Fujfilm X Raw Studio in-camera raw processor with tethered computer interface.
    • By Alan7140
      FrankF asked if I could write up something about processing X-Trans raw files, noting that his usual adjustments for NEF files didn’t work with RAF files.
      Straight off, and despite much dismissive hand waving by those who would use Adobe Lightroom or Camera Raw to process their files regardless of any opinion as to the quality of the end result for X-Trans files, I can only say that I’ve tried ACR at every update until CC Rent-a Shop came into play and the results, while tinkered with substantially about the edge, were still nowhere near as good as processors using Dave Coffin’s dcraw algorithms for the X-Trans demosaic.
      So the following will not be for Adobe users as I don’t use LR/ACR for X-Trans. Ever.
      As Frank uses Photo Ninja (as do I), I’ll run through what I do to convert X-Trans raw files using that program. This is just how I use it, I'm not suggesting it is gospel. I really like the results I get this way, so I guess that's what really matters to me - your needs might vary.
      For whatever reason the folk at PN did individualise their program by assigning names to sliders that are not common in their effect to more conventionally consistent names in other makers’ programs. This isn’t really a problem once familiarity is gained, but can be confusing at first.
      Here’s the image I used as Photo Ninja presented it straight from the demosaic. I used this image because it has fine detail, the highlights are overexposed, and there are many fine and small colour gradations - plus the folder was open on the computer anyway . As a photograph it isn’t anything much, but as a taxing of the demosaic it perhaps is.

      The following is how I have found it best to use the controls - this might differ from any “official” instructions, but hey, whatever works....
      Note that when you're working in any panel, clicking on the ◄► icon under the sliders (highlighted in screen grab below)will show the unprocessed image, releasing will show the processed image concerning that panel. After exiting one of the control panels for the overall menu, clicking on them will show the unprocessed image, releasing will show the processed image including all panels adjusted so far. So at any time you can flick back and forward between processed states without having to hunt all over the screen for a preview box to tick or un-tick.
      Here’s a screen grab at 100% of the image as opened, along with clipped highlight indicators:

      So here’s the PN controls panel as it has opened an un-worked image with default settings:

      Starting at the top, and the first hurdle which had me stumped for a long time when I first used this current version of PN (and which took an email to PN support to get an answer) is the “Color correction” menu.
      Misleading, because in it is the slider that controls what everyone else calls "Highlight recovery" but has been called “Color recovery” in PN. Further confusion is caused by the fact that its default setting is strength 100. At this setting PN will fill any blown highlights with an aggregate colour from the surrounding un-blown area, which can sometimes look awful, even taking on a solarised appearance.
      The Color correction panel:

      I have changed that default number to 50 in my prefs, which I find a better overall beginning setting for my files, but that might vary according to your shooting style. Whatever, it is something to be aware of.
      On the whole PN and Fuji together seem to do a good job on colour balance, but if there’s a lot of green in shot you’ll probably have to do a custom WB and knock excessive magenta compensation out of the default. I didn't mess with WB in this case, though, although it could be improved a bit I suppose. For comparison purposes I also thought a constant WB might be more useful. I would have warmed it up, although in this case the cool tone serves to locate the scene on the cusp of winter during a cold (6°C) day rather effectively.
      Next in the main panel is the primary adjustment menu - “Exposure and detail”.
      These are the settings it opened the sample image with:

      As can be seen, there’s a bit going on at the right of the histogram that’ll need hauling into line (clipped highlights indicated with the red line).
      The first thing to keep in mind is to try to work from the top down in this panel. The Illumination and Exposure offset sliders directly affect one another and should be worked in concert, keeping an eye on the highlight clipping indication in the preview image as well as watching the histogram. In this case in order to haul the highlights back it will be necessary to further reduce Exposure, then return the image to its original overall brightness with the Illumination slider. (If the image is underexposed to the left of the histogram, then the opposite movements of these two sliders will be required, and contrast increases in that case).

      As can be seen, the image no longer spills to the right, and the histogram light tones are a bit more centralised and the clipped highlights are recovered. The visual effect will be to have slightly flattened the contrast of the image, and as there is no need to adjust shadows as they are are not falling off the left of the histogram the Shadows and the Black sliders can be skipped and the Contrast slider gently bumped up until the shadows just start to block, and then backed off a bit. In this case enough punch was added back by shifting Contrast to +7.
      The final slider in this panel is the Detail slider and this must be approached with the utmost caution with X-Trans files. With Bayer files it is relatively gentle but with Fuji X it is vicious and some real artefacting can occur. I’ve found that maximum setting of +4 is all I can use before things get choppy.
      This slider can be used to the negative side with great effect to reduce grain noise, however, and sometimes works better than third party NR programs, or Noise Ninja itself, for that matter.
      Next comes the Color enhancement window. This has three presets in a drop-down menu - “Plain" (obvious as to effect), “Portrait” (which darkens/dulls green and blue but lightens/accentuates yellows and reds) and “Scenic” which saturates all colours.
      My default opening settings for this image:

      I have set my prefs to open this in Portrait mode as above, and will then use the fine-tuning sliders to alter the depth and saturation of individual colours as indicated in the colour boxes above the sliders. Select a box (green in this case) and adjust the Hue and Hue affinity sliders to bring back the brightness to the greens that the “Portrait” preset had killed a bit much.

      The rest of the control panels are more targeted and to be honest I rarely use them as I have other programs that do the job better. Occasionally I'll use the vignette for effect or the Chromatic aberration if processing a file taken with an older Nikon AI-s wide-angle, but the Fuji lenses really don't have any aberrations to worry about - at least none of mine do. Even the little Samyang 8mm fisheye is amazingly free or fringing.
      For sharpening I use Helicon Filter as a Photoshop plug-in, specifically the “sharpen fine details” slider in the sharpening panel, which usually gets best results between +15 & +25, and it has the least halo effect of any sharpener I have used.
      So here’s the finished processed shot

      And here’s a set of 100% sections of the before, the after, and one final one with +15 Helicon Filter sharpening as well.


      Processed and Helicon Sharpen Fine Details +15:

      The final version here might be a bit over-sharpened for screen, but is about what I find prints best on my Epson 7800 using Innova Smooth Cotton High White and Ilford Gallerie Gold Fibre Silk.
      Once familiar with the program, running through these adjustments takes only a few seconds, and from that point of view it is much quicker than other dcraw-based processors I've tried (Windows - I don't use Mac). But getting quick at it does take practice, as with anything.
      As always we'll be compromised by the ancient web colour space of sRGB and jpeg compression. Of course this image was processed in 16-bit Pro Photo colour space, and saved so tagged as an uncompressed TIFF, which means it probably looks a whole lot different to what you may be seeing on your monitor. One day the Web will catch up, maybe after it is done trying to be a phone app and gets back to being something worthwhile.

      View full article
    • By PatrickO
      I needed something wider than 18mm for the X-E1 to take pictures whilst doing safety inspections of heavy machinery. The choices were my superb Sigma 12-24mm in a Nikon mount, the Fuji 14mm and the Samyang 12mm f/2.0. The Sigma is slow at f/4.5 and quite large, and the Samyang is half the price of the Fuji.
      The loaner Samyang arrived today, and after an hour's use my first impressions are quite positive:
      Nicely packaged; not luxurious but not the bare minimum either.
      Nice looking lens.
      Smaller and more compact than I expected for a relatively fast lens. With hood reversed the camera with lens attached will fit in a Lowepro AW50 on my belt.
      Well made; not quite the Fuji XF, but good finishing, well polished and feels substantial. However the plastic lens-hood and focus collar feel like hard plastic of a type I've known to break on other types of equipment, but this is a subjective observation.
      Printed lettering, not engraved.
      Substantial metal mount with three screws
      The aperture ring clicks are audible and feel positive, with two clicks per stop. The aperture stops are clearly marked on the top of the lens.
      The focus ring is fairly tight on a warm day (mid twenty deg C), with no chance of creep. From near-to-far involves just over a 90 degree twist, and the focus mechanism is internal and rear elements do move. Distance scale is on the top of the lens in feet and metres, and is quite legible but printed on.
      There are no depth of field scales on the barrel.
      The hood is large and reversible, and does obscure the popup flash so much of the bottom half of the image will be in shadow. Clicking into place is positive, but it may become quite loose over time. The camera rests almost flat with the hood attached
      The front element does not protrude past the body of the lens, so you could stand the camera face down without the hood on a flat surface like a desk (not that I'd recommend it).
      Optics are coated, with a purple sheen on the front element and amber-purple at the rear.

      First impressions on performance are also good:
      I haven't taken any images of brick walls, but distortion seems managed and not fish-eye. Lines through the middle of the image are straight, and along the edges the distortion seems to be a simple curve and not complex moustache.
      Colour is neutral and not yellow as some Sigma lenses can be.
      Bokeh is smooth, but I haven't tested it on point sources yet.
      There is minor purple fringing on the edges of the frame in high contrast areas (i.e. twigs against white cloud). This seems better to the centre of the image.
      Drawing is pleasant and neutral.
      There is some vignetting, but it's not particularly obvious.
      Depth of field ranges is enormous at narrower apertures and at the long end, but it does have a narrow depth of field at the other end. Close up at f/2 took me by surprise. Maybe 15mm of depth is usably sharp at closest focus, 15cm of depth at 1m away.
      Resolution appears good and sharpness too.

      And the lens is very easy to use:
      It is manual focus only. For snaps just use focus peaking and hyperfocal distance and the X-E1 gets it every time.
      Use the camera zoom function for close work and wide apertures.
      It is much easier to focus than the Sigma 12-24, because one had to be careful with such a wide field to focus carefully or the lens would hunt a bit (also to do with aperture).
      Small enough to be convenient, but not too small for my hands (not the biggest, but not small either)

      My verdict is that this is a keeper. I will take some interesting images over the next few days and add them to my impressions.

      View full article

Important Information

By visiting this website you are agreeing to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy & Guidelines.