RED Hydrogen: A Smartphone For Image Makers


DFZ

Three and a half years ago, when Fotozones was first emerging as a forum for photographers who think alternatively about equipment, I wrote this piece called “Why aren’t camera makers thinking out of their boxes?”. Basically I was asking why a proper camera system couldn’t be built around the smartphone that I carry in my pocket everywhere I go. An interesting conversation ensued. 

 

It seems that the camera company RED are actually in the process of fulfilling this wish right now. Those of you who follow YouTube tech reviews may be familiar with one Marques Brownlee (aka MKBHD) who reviews a lot of tech stuff and is also a passionate RED user. Earlier today he posted a video showing a prototype RED smartphone called the Hydrogen, which is apparently going to become part of a camera system built around it. The video is embedded below. Watch it and then carry on reading my thoughts below that. 

 

 

So, we’re almost out of the box here. From what I can tell in the video and the limited information available on RED’s website, this phone is going to be able to be used with a variety of accessories that will enable the user to produce not only quality stills photography, but serious video too. According to Marques' video RED says it will be better than any mirrorless or DSLR video out there at the moment. If you skip to 5:06 in the video you will see the kind of modularity RED are looking at providing around this smart phone. This is great news for the camera industry because it will hopefully spark a reaction from the traditional manufacturers, who’s thinking on camera development has for decades been firmly planted in the box, albeit put there by technology limitations (which are rapidly disappearing).

 

What does this have to do with serious photography, you may ask? A smart phone is never going to replace the use of a Nikon D5 with a giant telephoto lens used on the planes of the Serengeti, but if the consumer market for cameras is all but moving into smart phones and the traditional camera makers are not looking to become a part of that market, they are doing themselves (and us serious photographers) a massive disservice. People love to spend money on phone accessories and what better way of creating a market for accessories is there than the gadget crazy world of photography and videography? The revenue from these accessories is ginormous and cannot be ignored by any company who are losing their traditional revenue streams to a market that has moved towards convenience in favour of traditionalism. 

 

To illustrate my point I recently took out a cellphone contract for the first time in about 8 years so that I could get a new iPhone 7 Plus to use as my primary video camera for material I want to make on safari this year. I decided against buying the Olympus E-M1 Mk II which has very good video features, because it costs twice as much as the phone I got (not counting the fact that I would have to buy a whole new set of batteries and more, faster memory cards). A new Olympus camera would sit unused in my gear storage bins for 99% of its life, devaluing faster than water draining from a punctured bucket. With the iPhone acquisition I got a brand new, top of the range device that not only takes pretty amazing video and stills, but also runs my entire digital life for me. It’s big enough for me to no longer require an iPad either. And I got a data and calling plan all for less than the monthly cost of repaying an Olympus E-M1 Mk II had I bought that on my credit card instead. My old cameras still work 100% and hopefully they will continue to do so for as long as I need them to. 

 

Here’s something else to think about; so far I have probably spent an additional 15% of the value of the phone on various accessories, including everything from cases to tripods, windshield mounts, microphone adapter cables and so on. I’m also giving very serious thought to buying a DJI Osmo Mobile which can track me if I am making a video and moving around my studio. The point I want to make though, is that buying just one device led me down a path of other purchases all related to that device, nothing related to my professional camera system. I might still look at buying an Olympus Air if I feel the need to pare down my system even further and make use of other lenses that I already own, but for the most part the upgrade money Olympus or Panasonic might have gotten from me has gone the way of Apple instead. Their device offers video I can use and not get bogged down getting it set up and ready for use. I choose my resolution and press record, which is all I really want to do. I don't want to know about any of the other things that movie makers need to have control over. I wanted convenience and quality and this little device delivers it.    

 

The camera companies of the world need to wake up. They have to make smart phones a part of their business otherwise they are going to go the way of the dinosaurs. I will also say this; as computational photography gets better and better, the need for specialist cameras and lenses is going to disappear faster than a Bugatti Veyron does when you're looking at the back of it. Apple’s Portrait mode on the iPhone 7 Plus may not be perfect right now, but it’s still in beta and I can see that a couple of iOS updates down the line this will be something to take very seriously. 

 

So, to end off I applaud RED for taking the initiative in this brave new world and I look forward to seeing not only the system they build around the Hydrogen, but also the competition’s response to it.


1 person likes this


Comments


This innovation will probably appeal to many people. Not for me though. My phone is for calls, my camera is for photos.

1 person likes this

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, vivionm said:

This innovation will probably appeal to many people. Not for me though. My phone is for calls, my camera is for photos.

 

YES!!!!

1 person likes this

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the video and have been curious about this smartphone.  I wonder which OS this Hydrogen will use?  The most affordable (yes, for the professional video system) Raven Camera Kit of RED is sold exclusively through Apple.  Would that suggest that Hydrogen would use iOS?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somehow Akira, I would be extremely surprised if that turned out to be the case!

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

It definitely won't be iOS. That is exclusive Apple territory. Most likely an Android device. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, vivionm said:

Here's a variant of the concept that has not set the world on fire.

 

http://www.dxo.com/us/dxo-one

 

 

That's not a phone. The RED is a smartphone, not just a camera. It forms part of a system that will be modular in nature.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

It attaches to a phone so that they form a single system. The phone screen becomes its control panel and viewfinder.

 

Sales are not spectacular.

Edited by vivionm

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see. Well, I'm not surprised it hasn't taken off if DxO is the brand. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never endorse the idea of attach anything as heavy as DXO-One to that flimsy Lightning socket, especially because the camera part is made to swivel while it is stuck to the socket.  The whole setup is too unreliable.

 

One reason for my suggestion of iOS is that it seems to be more multi-media friendly despite Apple's strict control of the system and third party apps.  Yes, Android would be more likely, but I wonder if it is efficient enough to handle such high quality video data of Hydrogen.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't have a proper look at the link Vivion posted until just now (was on my smartphone so the mobile friendly version of their website didn't have as much info as I see on the desktop). If you ask me, that clip on device is a giant step backwards and it puzzles me that DxO would even develop such a thing. The very first mobile phone I got that had a camera feature was a Motorola and it also had to be clipped on to the accessory port at the bottom of the device. It was just inconvenient. 

 

The RED Hydrogen is obviously a different animal altogether. There's the onboard camera lens and computer brains, but the system of modularity they are talking about enables greater use of the device for professional video (and stills I imagine) when required. The camera isn't external to the device. If you go to this link you will see a PDF giving more details on what this thing is going to be able to do. And yes, it is going to be Android. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dallas, thanks for the link to the PDF.  The Android OS and the price are disappointing or discouraging.  :(

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now