Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Leica to a T?


Dallas

There’s something about Leica. Yes, they’re expensive and quite often they’re underwhelming in the technical specs department, but that’s not the thing about them. Until you’ve actually owned and shot with one you can’t quite understand the hold they acquire over you. They’re like the ethereal fairy dust that keeps you interested in all things aesthetic.

My first Leica was a 1963 Leica M3 that I got somewhere around 2005 if memory serves. I got it for cheap change off an heir who was desperate for some cash at the time. It was one of the more desirable M bodies and the deal came with three lenses, a 90mm, 50mm and 35mm. What more could you ask for? My M3 was the single stroke version with a high serial number. I cherished it and I loved shooting it. Later I acquired a black M6 from a friend. That one was also a seductress, but it wasn’t quite as nice as the silver M3. A while later I also acquired a beautiful R4 and a couple of stunning R lenses, including the 180mm APO-telyt-R (in mint condition), also off a seller who had inherited them and didn’t check their value before settling for my offer of $200.

Karma eventually found its way back to me when I hit really hard times in about 2008 and I had to sell all my Leicas, amongst other items. I didn’t let them go quite as cheaply as I had acquired them for though, which is a reminder that there is always a market for desirable brands.

Since then I’ve lusted after getting more Leica’s, but in the digital age the Leica M system is a great big block of unobtainium for me. Maybe things have changed since yesterday’s announcement of the great big block of aluminium in the form of the all new Leica T mirrorless system?

My first impression of the Leica T is that it’s not designed to the same aesthetic that got me excited about owning Leica M’s. I really don’t like that it looks a lot like the Sony NEX range with a big grip on the side and what appears to be a thinnish body. The literature suggests that the design comes from Leica’s design partner, Audi Design. It’s a personal taste thing, I guess, but there will never be any Audis for me. I find them quite unattractive.

Notwithstanding my personal aversion to Audi design, there are some aspects of the Leica T that I do find interesting enough to write an article about. These are the things that have my attention:

gallery_2_394_23619.png

The Touch Screen Back

This is a bold move by Leica. It tosses the contents of the entire spaghetti colander at the ceiling to test whether they’ll stick or not. It’s the only control you have on the camera and it reinforces my recently stated view that cellphones and advanced cameras need to merge for the latter to remain relevant as a consumer product. This may be the beginning of such a convergence in practical design. Could a camera like the Leica T also become your cellphone? Why the hell not? Replace the lens with a body cap lens like the ones Olympus makes and it would certainly become pocketable. Carry your T lenses in a separate bag and you’ve got the makings of über convenient photography and communication.

I love touch screens because they let you control things in a way that engages your instinct. You hardly need to be taught how to use a touch screen. I can see a high degree of customisation being possible with something like this. Instead of having buttons that you can’t move, in the future it might be possible to design your own skin for your camera’s interface. Wouldn’t that be cool?

gallery_2_394_118874.png

The Accessories Range

Leica are well known for their accessories. Much like Apple Computer can somehow justify the price of their accessories by slapping their logo on them, I’m sure that if Leica sell this camera into the collective psyche of the brand obsessed consumer, they too might find themselves doing more turnover in high priced accessories than actual camera bodies. Straps, covers, bags, hard shells, soft shells… you name it. People buy into premium brands because they perceive them to be associated with a certain level of class. I haven’t seen anybody putting a Samsung sticker on their car window, but I have seen plenty of Apple stickers on cars. Leica could become a similarly prevalent aspirational brand and break out of the elitist mould that their previous pricing strategies have fostered.

The Price

The price of the Leica T body is reported to be around $1850, which while relatively high compared to similar mirrorless camera products, does provide an attainable stepping stone into the Leica system for many (like me who’s previous forays into the brand were entirely dependent on finding unloved film bodies being sold for a song by ignorant heirs). The problem for me personally should I adopt a Leica T as a personal camera would be finding another $2k to spend on an entry level zoom lens. Leica has released this camera together with 2 lenses. The basic 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 “kit” zoom (they call it the Vario-Elmar-T) will cost $1700 and the 23mm f/2.0 Summicron-T will cost $1950. Ouch. Then there is the optional EVF that costs $600. Ouch with exclamation!

So to get yourself set up with the T, zoom lens and an EVF you’re looking at $4150 and you haven’t added a strap or case yet. It’s certainly not a system for the feint of wallet, but then it wouldn’t be Leica if it was, would it?

gallery_2_394_29724.png

The Mount

This is the thing that has most of my attention. Leica have taken the step of being the first legacy system manufacturer since Olympus and Panasonic to introduce an entirely new mount for an entirely serious mirrorless camera system. They're starting something new but also offering something old to prop it up along the way. This is not an insignificant point to note.

Here on Fotozones I’ve been saying for a long time that if the likes of Nikon and Canon want to enter the mirrorless market seriously, they will have to make a decision on whether they want to engineer around their legacy mounts (F and EF) or develop an entirely new mount and range of lenses. The Nikon 1 and EOS M are not serious mirrorless cameras in my opinion.

What we’re seeing here from Leica is that they’ve decided to follow the path of new development rather than abandon their existing M mount. BUT they’ve done it in a way that allows full use of their legacy M system via adapter, which is crucial to retaining legacy customer participation in the brand. This is a leaf right out of the four thirds and micro four thirds story book. Nobody gets left behind. I’m confident that Nikon and Canon may both be watching how this move is received by existing Leica customers with interest, because it’s their own customers who are calling out for modernisation of their products too.

Conclusion?

Do I want a Leica T? Well, I’m always game to try new things, so yes, I do. Some of the sample images I have seen from reviewers show me that it definitely offers that unique Leica “look”, but in spite of this and the things I have mentioned in this article, it doesn’t quite have the same hold on my emotions that a Leica M does. There are things about the T that I find good, like the touch screen and the ability to use M glass, but there are other essential things from a photographer’s perspective that are missing, such as image stabilisation and a built-in EVF.

On the whole I might be less than blown away, but I do think that Leica is on the right path with this product line. Perhaps a future iteration of a T body will blow its magic dust towards my heart. For now though I guess I’m going to have to wait for somebody with an M9 and an ignorant heir to die before I find myself back in the Leica brandishing business.

Sign in to follow this  


Comments

Recommended Comments

Superficially it looks like a Sony Nex, but the user interface is very different. There are two command wheels instead of one, and in addition there are only two more buttons. The rest is done via the touch menus. A Nex has a lot of buttons and only one command wheel, except for the Nex-7. The user interface sets the Leica T apart from Sony Nex.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of trees look alike- without being more than distantly related. 

They claim form follows function. In that case lots of future cameras will look like this.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Target market?

 

Rich people who enjoy buying the red circle. They probably won't be able to make enough of them.....

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest jrflanne

Posted

I know this might sound stupid but this camera seems nothing but a very expensive V3.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

V3 has a considerably smaller sensor, no touch screen and doesn't work well with the legacy lenses. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest jrflanne

Posted

I know all that. Seems like a whole lot of money but Nikon has the FT-1 which probably adapts to more lenses than the 20 the Leica adaptor does. Don't get me wrong, it is an extremely cool camera and one the Leica guys will just love. But to kit one out with a couple of lenses, viewfinder and sundry other stuff will bring you north of 6 grand in a hurry. The bag looks very nice though.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superficially it looks like a Sony Nex, but the user interface is very different. There are two command wheels instead of one, and in addition there are only two more buttons. The rest is done via the touch menus. A Nex has a lot of buttons and only one command wheel, except for the Nex-7. The user interface sets the Leica T apart from Sony Nex.

Is the control system so much better as to justify the high price?  I don't buy into the idea of why a new mount system is necessary when the existing Leica system had a much shorter flange to image plane distance than SLR and DSLR systems.

 

I suppose the good news is if the control system is so wonderful it will be copied.  These T mount systems will sell in small quantities I expect.  For me an eye level viewfinder is a must, and having to depend on an accessory is a distraction.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron, I guess it has to do with autofocus and other features that the M series can't support. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron, the control system alone may not justify the price. My point was that I think it is better than on the Nex, but creating a better control system than Sony does isn't that difficult. ;) Personally I find the Olympus OM-D E-M1 to have a very good control system. The presense of two command wheels on the Leica T is key to why I think it's good, and I like touch interfaces. Screens are easier to read than labels on a button and makes the camera less cluttered in my opinion.

The T mount is bigger the old M mount, according to Ming Thein it's as large as the Canon EOS mount. This means that it most likely can support future full frame cameras too. Also it will be easy to design lenses for the T mount. I think Leica has done well to introduce a new electronic mount rather than design around a legacy mount. In addition the M lens owner can use the M lenses on the new camera via an adapter without limitations on their use.

Compared to the price on a Leica M, the Leica T isn't that bad, and I guess Leica will be sold out on this one.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

The touch screen is not all that bad and not only for the hobby cameras.  Phase One IQ backs uses touch screen sensor which contribute to fewer buttons.  My Panasonic GF5 (a mind used one bought for about 90 USD) has a very sophisticated touchscreen.  I'm impressed.

 

Also, I think I think 16MP sensor is a very reasonable selection.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Dallas
      I just got word that Olympus has updated the firmware in the E-M1 Mk II and this sees it now getting a lot more of the features that the E-M1X has, including improved AF, expanded ISO range (down to ISO 64) as well as some other stuff that I didn't even know these cameras could do. Here's Robin Wong to run through some of the details.  
       
       
       
    • By Luc de Schepper
      This lens is an good example of the advantages the new Z-mount brings. The large diameter of the Z mount allows the lens designers to come up with new exciting and/or better performing lenses. The Z 24-70mm f4 is an example of the latter, it's optimised for the new mount and thus behaves in a way like the similarly optimised lenses for the Micro Four Thirds system, the outstanding Olympus 12-40mm f2.8 comes to mind. 
       
      The Nikkor Z 24-70mm f4 has excellent MTF figures but what's more important in every day use, it's a no-nonsense tool for fantastic images. Finally a "standard range" zoom lens for a full frame system that to me has no flaws. Sharpness is outstanding, even in the far corners. Optical distortion is corrected in the RAW profile and Jpegs. Color, contrast and bokeh are good (although the Z 50mm f1.8 has more punch). Built, size and handling are also very nice. In a kit combined with the Z6 or Z7 this lens represents great value for money and should be a no-brainer when contemplating the purchase of a Z6 or Z7.
       
      Some images (all shot on a Nikon Z6)
       
      1. f5 1/13sec iso320

       
      2. f5 1/15sec iso560

       
      3. f5.6 1/40sec iso100

       
      4. f10 1/13sec iso100

       
      5. f4 1/1600sec iso 100

       
    • By Dallas
      Today is the first time since it was announced that I have been able to look into the new Canon EOS R mirrorless camera. I gotta say that at first glance I much prefer the look of it compared to Nikon's Z7. It seems to look more like an SLR and less like something Sony designers hobbled together with a Mechano set.  In this thread I will post some videos and impressions of the camera. Would love to hear other reader's thoughts on it too. 
       
      Here's the first video from an actual photographer who takes actual photos and not a "vlogger". I really like the idea of the control ring on the lens being programmable to shift a camera setting, such as aperture, although I wonder how practical it is in real life if you accidentally change a setting while handling the camera. I manage to do this regularly on my Olympus E-M1 and I have turned off most of the programmable buttons. 
       
       
       
      It does look like a very large camera compared to the Z7 and that lens is a real monster! 
    • By Dallas
      So Nikon has announced they will bring in the new professional mirrorless camera with a new mount and adaptability to F mount lenses. I don't think they had any choice in the matter, to be honest. 
       
      I think we will see a couple of new mirrorless bodies. There will probably be a flagship and a prosumer grade body. I reckon the flagship will most likely have the designation of DM-1 and the prosumer most likely a DM-300 or something along those lines. 
       
      Hopefully they will have designed something that inspires the competition to up their game too, but based on recent pricing of models such as the D5, I reckon we can expect a wince when the prices are announced, which will leave ample room for the competitors like MFT, Sony and Fuji to compete well. 
    • By Dallas
      Last year when Sony announced their “full frame” 135 mirrorless camera duo of the A7 and A7r they got the attention of quite a few photographers who wanted the large sensor capability of a 35mm frame in a smaller, lighter mirrorless body. The advantages of the mirrorless cameras I have written about at length, so I won’t go into them again for this article, but one of those advantages was that you could use an adapter to mount just about any lens from any manufacturer on the A7’s and enjoy the short depth of field you get from a large sensor on either a 24 or a huge 36 megapixel sensor. Lots of shooters jumped onboard this train.
      Now Sony have announced a third body in the A7 series, namely the A7s, which is the same body, but with a lower resolution of only 12 megapixels and according to the press release the ability to shoot a 135 body at ridiculously high ISO values (somewhere over 400,000 ISO).
      What’s interesting to me about these cameras is not so much that they’ve made the first mirrorless 135 system (not counting the Leica M’s because they are not autofocus), but that they’ve done it in three distinctly different flavours, giving the photographer some system options that they don’t get from any other manufacturer at present.
      If you want to shoot extreme high resolution images you opt for the A7r with its 36mp sensor. You get amazing resolution and the ability to produce massive prints with the best possible dynamic range.

      For general purpose photography you opt for the A7 with its 24mp sensor and you have not only great image quality, but you don’t have to be as careful as you would need to be when shooting the high res A7r.

      If you want to go nuts and shoot in total darkness with scant regard for camera shake you get the A7s and pump up the ISO until you exceed the max shutter speed in near darkness and you get great image quality.

      On the top and the back they all look like this:


      What I like about this approach is that it’s the same body used in all three variations, so the buttons and dials are exactly the same. The only thing different is what's inside the box. If you’re shooting with something like Nikon or Canon and you wanted the same sensor flexibility you would have to buy three completely different bodies, each with it’s own interface and layout. For example, to get the same kind of sensor variability with Nikon you would have to buy a D800, D610 and D4S. You would have to know each body quite well to be able to swap between them easily. Right now pros shooting the top end of the DSLR market don't have a body like the Nikon D4S or Canon 1DX packing a 36mp sensor, or even a 24mp one. You've only got the one sensor to choose from. If you want more pixels you have to look at a different body and one that doesn't share the same feature set as your pro body.
      By offering different sensors in three identical bodies Sony have given their brand adopters a very handy system perch that will allow them to accomplish all manner of things photographically without having the inconvenience of needing to learn a new button layout or menu system for each iteration. I think that’s a brilliant strategy. Can Nikon and Canon compete with that? Well, given the price of the D4S I don't see too many professional photographers being in a position to be able to afford three of the same types of bodies. However, it does beg the question of a future pro DSLR having the ability of being able to swap out the sensor as part of the system. Whether that's something they can do feasibly remains to be seen. Personally I think it would probably take them too long on the R&D front, so realistically speaking following Sony's approach of offering a cheaper mirrorless body might be the way forward. For Canon this would probably be a lot simpler than it would be for Nikon, who bring with them over half a century of legacy engineering to be worked around.
      What Sony needs to do now to build on this sisterhood of bodies is to further develop their lens line-up as well as the range of other accessories that photographers seek out (flashes, remotes, etc). If they can begin to offer the same kind of lens choice depth as the major players like Canon, Nikon and Micro Four Thirds, they will be a very strong market player going forward.

      View full article
  • Join Our Small Community

    Like what you see on Fotozones? Why not join up and make friends with like-minded photography enthusiasts from all across the planet. We are limiting our membership to no more than 2000 individuals, so if you are seeing this message there is still space available for you to join. We'd love to have you along. :)  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By visiting this website you are agreeing to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy & Guidelines.