Jump to content

Hands On: The Pentax K-1 and Pixel Shift


Michael Erlewine

Here is a quick report on the new Pentax K1 in the actual work situations I find myself in. There is good news and bad news... for me. The bad news is that it looks like I have to learn (and put up) with another camera. Part of it is that I am used to my Nikons and all of that. The other part is that, IMO, the Pentax K1 interface as not as easy to use or as well-designed as Nikon. I would send it back just to spare myself the aggravation but for the very nice results. At this point, I am just checking it out a little bit, and trying to get over holding my nose while I am at it.

 

The color with the Pentax is crisper, brighter, more natural (almost too contrasty!) compared to the overall muddier look of my Nikon D810, now that I see them side by side. Ouch!

 

I don’t have a ton of lenses for the K1 and the Pentax (so far anyway) is much less tolerant of odd lenses than are my Nikons bodies. If everything is equal, which it is not, then the Pentax is... doable IMO.

 

The Pentax pixel-shift files are huge, and a real pain for my computer, not to mention their storage requirements  (~ 150K each). The LCD screen on the back of the camera is very adjustable, but I won’t be using it because I need my Zacuto Z-Finder magnifier on the back for fine focus, and it is needed. This camera is very fussy with focus.

 

On the plus side,  the K1 has a fairly easy-to-use LiveView magnifier that goes up to something like 16x, which is more than I need or makes sense.

The pixel-shift files take a long time to write out and you get no warning if you decide to call it a day and yank the card before the little light goes out. Don’t do it!

 

You can stack focus with these files, but at the price of degradation of the files... a little bit. For my work, the Pentax K1 will probably be used to take single shots photos at high f/Stops like f/12-16. Yes, there is some diffraction, but I seem to get away with much smaller f/stops in pixel-shift mode with the K1 than on my Nikon D810.

 

So, the bottom line is Uggh for learning a new camera, and one not as elegant as the D810. There are other considerations as well.

 

Stacking K1 images, like all stacking, messes with the color and the contrast to a degree. With the K1, the pristine color is the main attraction. So far, it seems it would be better to take one-shot photos with the K1 in pixel-shift than to try and stack them. Oh yes, they stack of course, but the added contrasts, etc. may look good from a distance, but up close it looks worse than a single-shot photo, not the anyone but a pixel-peeper could tell. All stacks do, but the more pristine possibilities of the K1 in pixel-shift mode make me want to think twice before stacking. What I might want to do is combine stacked layers in Photoshop by simply copying over certain areas, instead of running the layers through the stacking software, thus avoiding the added contrast and color muddiness that stacking brings. Just a thought.

 

Also, right now I have only a few Voigtlander lenses that have Pentax mounts. I have an adapter to Nikon and tried on the Otus 55mm and it works, etc. However, I look forward to mounting the Pentax K1 on a bellows unit and using lenses like El Nikkor 105mm APO lenses on the front standard.

In short, I just have my toe in the water. Part of me wishes my Nikons could do pixel-shift, because their cameras would be a lot easier for me to use, since I already know them. But the bleeding edge never sleeps and new equipment drives me on.

 

I am interested to see Sony’s upgrade for the A7rII and Nikons upgrade of the D810 whenever they come. Meanwhile the purity of color of the pixel-shift with the K1 and the overall result is worth checking out IMO.

 

Photos taken with the Pentax K1, Voigtlander 90mm APO.

 

I have included stacked images at f/9 and f/16 and one layer not-stacked, if that helps. This is all new, but the results better than I can get with Bayer interpolation. The pain of progress... learning all this.

 

Thanks to Lloyd Chambers for doing a lot of research on this camera in his columns.

 

K1AA0099-F-9-Not-ST-NG.jpg

K1AA0100-1-CV90-F16-ST-NG.jpg

K1AA0098-1-CV90-F9-ST-NG.jpg

D7A_2040.jpg

  • Like 2


Comments

Recommended Comments

Impressive - and I do see what you mean by "brighter" colours. That red-orange is truly vivid.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great post, Michael, thanks for sharing your findings with us. 

As I mentioned to Andrew, Invision have seen fit to remove the "Promote To Article" feature that became such an integral part of the way I was operating Fotozones (I am truly coming to detest the company who builds this software and their attitude towards their customers). I now need to figure out a way of manually doing this while attributing authorship to the contributor, so please bear with me, but this sort of contribution from the community is what sets Fotozones apart from other communities, in my opinion. 

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those look great!   I feel your pain in regards to needing to learn 2 different camera interfaces.  It can be pain a sometimes, but as you stated, if this secondary system is providing you something that you can't get with the others, then it can be worth it.

Looking forward to seeing more of your K1 images in the future.

Thanks for sharing.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have manually made an article of this great post, but the comments are not linked to the forum post like they used to be. 

Update: A-ha! I figured out a workaround to keep the forum comments in sync with the article comments. :) 

Edited by DDFZ
Update
  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Larry
      Doing away with AA filters, Nikon, Pentax, Sony and Canon have improved image acuity.  On the other hand, one area where camera manufacturers could further improve on image quality is by doing away with the use of a Bayer Color Filter Array (CFA) and in the process, do away with the need to demosaic the captured image.    In this regard, Sigma with its Foveon sensor has managed to make some progress but seemingly hit a hard wall from using a multi-layered sensor in terms of signal to noise ratio (SNR) and dynamic range (DR) within just 2-3 stops from Base ISO.  Fuji on the other hand went another route using a non-Bayer CFA but still have to contend with some issues in still having have to demosaic the image due to the use of a CFA.
       
      Ever since this was announced some months back, I have been keenly following any news about the Pentax K-1 and its Pixel Shift Resolution (PSR) feature.  Using multiple 4-shots and using its on-sensor image stabilization to move the sensor one-pixel, the K-1 is able to side-step the limitations of using a Bayer CFA and the need to demosaic the captured image.  At the same time, Pentax uses the additional light captured in the 4-shot PSR process to identify and eliminate the shot noise generated, significantly improving the SNR, with benefits to dynamic range as well.  Using a 36mp sensor similar to that used on the Nikon D800/D800E/D810, the Pentax K-1 shows significant improvements over the D810 when PSR is enabled.  Others would even claim that the Pentax K-1 compares well against some medium format cameras.
       
      More info on the Pentax K-1 can be glimpsed using the link below.  The Pentax K-1 compares well against the D810 even without the PSR enabled, but even more so with the PSR enabled.
       
      http://www.dpreview.com/news/2055527036/pentax-k-1-s-pixel-shift-challenges-medium-format-dynamic-range
       
      "The multiple sampling of the same scene effectively gives a 2EV dynamic range boost, meaning it out-performs both the D810 and the 645Z by a comfortable margin."
    • By Dallas
      If you have used the Pentax K-01 camera, let us know what you thought of it in this thread.

      We'd like to keep this thread as relevant as possible, so off-topic posts may be split off to other parts of fotozones.com.
  • Join Our Small Community

    Like what you see on Fotozones? Why not join up and make friends with like-minded photography enthusiasts from all across the planet. We are limiting our membership to no more than 2000 individuals, so if you are seeing this message there is still space available for you to join. We'd love to have you along. :)  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By visiting this website you are agreeing to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy & Guidelines.