Jump to content

Comparison: Fuji X100s, Fuji X-T1, Olympus OM-D


Andrew L (gryphon1911)

You may have read that we sold off all our Fuji X cameras and got the Nikon Df. We are happy to report that we are still very much pleased with the Nikon Df and use it whenever we can.

The Df is my daily carry camera – it is with me 95% of the time. So what about the other 5%. Those are usually those times when having the Df is not practical. I’ve been wanting/lusting after what the Fuji X100s has to offer. I’ve only passingly handled the X100 and thought with all the improvements the X100s had to offer, it would be that much better.

Walking into my favorite camera store this recently, I had every intention of leaving with the X100s. However, my friends there gave me the opportunity to use and handle the following cameras:

Fuji X100s, Fuji X-T1, Olympus OM-D-EM-5 and the Olympus OM-D E-M1. I’ve been hearing a lot of good things about all these cameras and I could not pass up the opportunity to work with them all head to head.

I do not have sample images from all of the cameras, as this report is not as much about image quality as it is handling and performance speed. If we are honest, I think we know that the Fuji will have the IQ edge, especially in the realm of the hi ISO. We will concede to that right now.

One of my main issues with the Fuji system has always been the speed at which the camera performs. This includes powering up, waking from sleep, accessing menu items and AF speed and acquisition.

Let us have a quick rundown of the positives.

X100s_pic_additional_01.jpg

Image © Fujifilm

Fuji X100s

Feels great in the hand.

Solid build.

OVF is nice, clear and bright. EVF is a great alternative to have.

Upgraded MF(compared to the X100) is much better to use.

Great 23mm f/2 lens

fuji+x-t1_img_main01.jpg

Image © Fujifilm

Fuji X-T1

Solid build.

Fit my hands like it was custom made for me.

EVF was comprehensive and responded quickly to orientation changes.

The top dials were solid and had a nice click to them. I did not think that I would accidentally knock any of them out of their position by accident.

It seems to be the fastest responsive Fuji X camera to date(accessing menus, powering up, waking from sleep).

Very quick AF in comparison to the other X cameras.

Great prime and zoom lenses.

em5_hero_black.png

Image © Olympus

Olympus OM-D EM5 and EM1

Very quick AF.

Solid build quality.

Good EVF.

Nice feel in the hand.

Great prime lenses.

Now let’s talk about what everyone wants to know – which is, when compared to each other, what do I think?

We need to level set/full disclosure and let you know what the shooting conditions were.

When using an ILC, the kit zooms were used(The ones that claim “world’s fastest AF” in the ads…lol). For the Fuji, it was the 18-55mm f/2.8-4 OIS…the Olympus used the 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3.

Images were taken/AF performance tested inside the camera shop, which had fluorescent lights. It was dim, but probably a little brighter than your average indoor environment.

Also, this is not a scientific test. It is my learned observation and experiences that I am reporting on.

We are going to start with the Fuji cameras since the X100s was what I thought I wanted the most and the X-T1 is what everyone is currently talking about. The AF speed on the X100s was still about the same as the X100, maybe a little faster. It did seem a little more sure, but it did have quite a bit of front to back shuffle before locking into focus. Once it got focus, it was almost always 100% accurate. Unfortunately, the X-T1 suffered from the same front/back shuffle before locking focus. Yes, it is very fast – probably the fastest AF I’ve seen in any X camera to date….but Fuji still seems to have a way to go on getting the AF to something great and not just adequate. I was disappointed in this behavior…which is sad because I so much wanted Fuji to be better than what it was. On the plus side, it is nice that the X-T1 can track focus in a continuous shooting mode.

One of my biggest handling issues with the Fuji X cameras are AF point selection. I’ve gotten so used to my DSLRs and the 4 way pad being dedicated to picking the AF point – it was one of the reasons I had for deciding to drop my X-E1. This still is an issue here for both the X100s and the X-T1.

Both the X100s and X-T1 felt good in the hand, albeit they have different ways of gripping them. The X-T1 is beefier and felt very natural to hold, especially coming from using a DSLR.

Moving on to the Olympus offerings of the OM-D EM-5 and the OM-D EM1. I want to begin by saying that I was never a fan of m43 in the past. I always had a preconceived bias against it because of the smaller sensor size. That has all changed now that I was able to handle one and see what it is all about.

Yes, we cannot get around physics and there are just some things that a smaller sensor just cannot do. I’ve noticed that there does not seem to be as large a dynamic range as the Nikon or Fuji cameras I’ve shot in the past. I will say that I was impressed at just how useable the files were from the Olympus cameras up to ISO 2000. It starts getting a little rougher around ISO 3200/6400…but if you nail exposure and don’t have a lot of pitch black areas….you can still have a good JPG to work with.

Now… getting to what really impressed me on the EM5/EM1. The AF performance was almost instantaneous. I mean…I could not believe what I was seeing here. Same lighting conditions and with a slower (aperture wise) kit zoom lens, the Olympus nailed focus immediately and without any back/front dance as was seen in the Fuji offerings. I bounced all over the place grabbing focus at different distances and at different focal lengths. It did not seem like I could trip up the Olympus AF. Even with the contrast detect only AF of the Olympus OM-D EM-5 it was direct, to the point and accurate. I was surprised here…but in a very good way. I heard people before praising the AF performance, but I did not think it to be this good.

The speed also moves over into the menu usage and boot up times as well. The menu systems run very quick and smooth. They are a bit deep, lots of options and they are not in any way similar to what I’m used to with my Nikon or Fuji menus. Startup from power off to on was very quick. Not DSLR instant, but way better than the Fuji cameras – not including the X-T1. Fuji listened and boosted the start up time for the X-T1. Good job on that.

At the end of the day, what does all this mean?? It means that I walked out of the camera store with anOlympus OM-D EM-5 and 12-50mm kit.

omd_front_lens_flash-down.jpg

Image © Olympus

Do I still want a Fuji X100s? Well, yeah...maybe in the future. However, by the time I am ready for that - Fuji may very well have a full frame X200 to replace the X100s....at least I'm hoping that is the inevitable direction.

03-09-2014_EM5_COSI_P3090041-Edit.jpg

E-M5 12-50/3.5-6.3

1/30, f/5.3, ISO 2000

Want more information? OK…lets talk about it.

When comparing the above systems, the Olympus was the most DSLR like in looks and control. The only thing that the Fuji X offerings had a resounding lead on over the Olympus was in sensor size and hi ISO image quality. The Olympus was better in almost every respect beyond that. And at base ISO - the Olympus m43 sensor is doing just fine. The image examples on this page should let you see that.

03-09-2014_EM5_COSI_P3090028-Edit.jpg

E-M5, 12-50/3.5-6.3

1/20, f/6.3, ISO 2000

Add to this, the fast prime lenses for the Olympus system are way smaller, and can be found cheaper never hurts. I even preferred the EVF of the Olympus over that of the Fuji X-T1. Yes, the Fuji has more unique features, but I thought the smearing of the Olympus was not as pronounced in the low light shooting conditions as the Fuji. Honestly, I still prefer an OVF…but those seems to be looking more and more like a feature we will see less of as we progress into the future.

In my mind, and for my way of shooting, if I need extreme low light, super high ISO performance, I’ve got my Nikon Df/D700 to choose from. The Olympus gives me a very responsive performance machine in a smaller package.

03-15-2014_EM5_olytest_P3150008-Edit.jpg

E-M5, 17/1.8

1/640, f/2.8, ISO 100

I was honestly surprised I walked out of there with an m43 camera. I’ve shot with it for only a few days, but I am so happy with this cameras performance at this point. I did have a slight moment of regret at first, when I ran through an initial set of images. For some reason, I was not getting that "pop" or "wow factor" that I expected from the images. I thought that I was perhaps missing something as this is a new camera system to me. After a few days of research, I did realize 2 things:

1 - optics on the OM-D matter. The kit 12-50/3.5-6.3, while convenient and weather sealed is not the sharpest or most contrasty lens. I noticed an immediate increase in IQ when I put on the 17/1.8 or the 45/1.8 prime lenses.

2 - for some unknown reason, Olympus gives you the OM-D cameras setup as base as possible. I mean, they have a higher jpg compression on by default and the default noise reduction is a bit much as well.

03-09-2014_EM5_COSI_P3090047-Edit.jpg

E-M5, 12-50/3.5-6.3

1/80, f/5.6, ISO 1600

Keep an eye out for a future post where I discuss how I setup the OMD EM5 to be optimized for the way I shoot. There are quite a few steps, but once its done, you never have to do it again.

03-15-2014_EM5_olytest_P3150050-Edit.jpg EM5, 17/1.8

1/60, f/4, ISO 640

And to end this all out - here is a random thought from me about mirrorless and the US market. This is just my theory and is in no way scientific.

When I look at the mirrorless camera offerings, the majority of them looked a lot like the point and shoot style cameras we have been seeing for years. I think this hurts their perception because for years "professionals" used DSLRs and they have a certain look to them.

Now that entry level DSLRs are sometimes less expensive than some point and shoots, no one wants to have their "pro" camera mistaken for a point and shoot...thus the mirrorless cameras don't get the marketing credibility that the DSLR still has here.

03-15-2014_EM5_olytest_P3150057-Edit.jpg

EM5, 17/1.8

1/1250, f/4, ISO 100

I think Olympus saw this and when they went from the PEN design to the OM-D design, they will get a lot more of the casual users accepting it a "pro" level body because of the design. I think Fuji has understood this too and thus the look of the X-T1 will make it a more attractive option.

Once the everyday folk understand that the mirrorless camera can come in many shapes and sizes, they will be more widely adopted. Again...just a theory, and a fraction of the reason that mirrorless is having a rough go of it here in the states.

Visit Andrew's blog here


Comments

Recommended Comments

Andrew, I have not used an E-M5 for any length of time but have used the E-M1 extensively for 2-months (borrowed from my brother).  I will likely  get an E-M1 when the Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8 is released.  What made you choose the E-M5 over the E-M1?

 

On the matter of the dSLR's advantage in the ease with which AF point is designated or selected, I agree on this.  The E-M1 rear control buttons functions equally well as the D700.  Does the rear control buttons of the E-M5 allow you to do this as easily as you could with the D700?  How was it with the XT-1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew,

 

Thank you for taking the initiative to post your impressions of these cameras. I was intrigued at how your response to a particular camera actually deflected you from what you had previously (emotionally?) selected. That is always good information and a good reminder that in a technical space that is not all that well differentiated the feel and response to something is worth a lot in a field that is about confidence in the tools and artistic expression.

 

Was there any particular reason why you picked the EM5 over the EM1?

 

Regards,

Roger

Edited by streetsntravel
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
Andrew L (gryphon1911)

Posted

Andrew, I have not used an E-M5 for any length of time but have used the E-M1 extensively for 2-months (borrowed from my brother).  I will likely  get an E-M1 when the Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8 is released.  What made you choose the E-M5 over the E-M1?

 

On the matter of the dSLR's advantage in the ease with which AF point is designated or selected, I agree on this.  The E-M1 rear control buttons functions equally well as the D700.  Does the rear control buttons of the E-M5 allow you to do this as easily as you could with the D700?  How was it with the XT-1?

 

I chose the EM5 over the EM1 for several reasons.  First, I liked where the controls on the camera body were placed better on the EM5.  Second, I liked the smaller, sleeker body design.  I plan on using this camera as a ultra light weight option.  Most of the time, I'm going to be using my Nikon Df, but for times when I need to go ultra light - this with the 17 or 45/1.8 will be the one that I choose.  I can put it in a coat pocket or I also have a small belt pouch that I can put the EM5 in.

 

I like that fact that I can also add on the additional grip and/or battery separate to give me the larger bulk if I want it.  The EM1 has the shutter release further forward and the built in grip.  I couldn't slim it down if I wanted to.  If I were to get rid of all my DSLRs and go m43 - the EM1 would be the primary shooter.

Last point is the price.  I did not want to spend the extra money on the EM1 body, when I would rather spend it on more lenses.  So far, this 17/1.8 is one of the best prime lenses I've ever used.  Unbelievable sharpness at f/1.7 and for the price!!  If I want that from my Nikon primes, I'm paying $1000 o $1500 for them.  I was considering a PEN style body and the EP5 ticked all the right boxes except one - no built in EVF.  For me an EVF/OVF is a must have.

 

Regarding the controI pad on the back, I think that my thumb rests more naturally to the position on the Nikon D700 and Df.  That being said, it doesn't take me long to get used to where the control pad is located on the EM5.  The buttons are a bit mushy from the weather sealing and they are a bit small.   I've gotten used to them quickly though.  In comparison to the X-T1, they feel the same size wise.  What I liked about the Olympus is that once I press one of the direction pads, it accepts that as input to move the AF point.  The other thing I like is that the control wheel can also be setup to control the AF point.  I personally would not use it this way, but a nice option to have.

 

I think Fuji botched up the AF point selection on their mirror less when they require you to press either a AF activation button or press up on the control pad on the rear, then move your AF point.

 

Bottom line for me though is that Fuji is still missing the mark on speed of control and AF acquisition speed.  

So far, Olympus has been the only mirror less camera maker that I could honestly say has given us as close to DSLR performance as we have seen yet.  The new Nikon V3 might be getting there...but Nikon has FUBARed that poor thing.

 

Hope I covered everything you asked about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Andrew.  I now better understand your choosing the EM-5 over the E-M1.  I have not spent much time with the E-M5 and am wondering whether there might be something there that I missed.  

 

What surprised me is how the XT-1 AF-point designation is still a 2-button press process.  This is how I understand it from my reading the blogs and you have now also confirmed it.  The X-T1 is intended as a faster dSLR mirrorless substitute and this 2-button press to designate the AF-point considerably slows down the shooting process and is thus puzzling to me.  Thank you again Andrew.

Edited by Larry
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
Andrew L (gryphon1911)

Posted

Thanks Andrew.  I now better understand your choosing the EM-5 over the E-M1.  I have not spent much time with the E-M5 and am wondering whether there might be something there that I missed.  

 

What surprised me is how the XT-1 AF-point designation is still a 2-button press process.  This is how I understand it from my reading the blogs and you have now also confirmed it.  The X-T1 is intended as a faster dSLR mirrorless substitute and this 2-button press to designate the AF-point considerably slows down the shooting process and is thus puzzling to me.  Thank you again Andrew.

 

Glad I could clarify your questions.

 

I too am unsure of why Fuji would not allow for AF point selection to be a primary function.  If you are a "set and recompose" type of shooter, I guess it doesn't bother you.  However, I've tried that in the past, and especially when I was using wide open apertures, I noticed I was not getting the critical sharpness I was wanting because the focal plane shift was just enough to miss the mark.

 

Fuji is getting there.  I just have some trepidation with them at the moment as the latest rumor to come out is that there will be another X series body released in a few months.  Dallas pointed this out before and I think it is a good point.  The Fuji OEM lens lineup needs more TLC than adding new bodies.  They still don't have a full range of optics

 

I mean...right now these are the current X cameras on the market:

 

XF1

XQ1

X-E1/X-E2

X-Pro1

X-T1

X-M1

X-A1

X10/X20

X100/X100s

 

Now there is going to be another??  I hope it is an update to the X-Pro1 because if they add another new body design into the mix....it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense as there is a ton of overlap that doesn't need to be and I think has the potential to confuse consumers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would put my money on an update to the X-Pro1, likely using the same 24mp sensor that Sony used in the A6000 but with the same color filter array that Fuji used with the X-trans.  Given what Fuji was able to do with the XT-1 AF even while making do with the same sensor used in the XE-2, this new model would be even better in AF performance than the XT-1.  I expect this no earlier than late 3Q or even 4Q this year.

 

Given the very good market response to the XT-1 as a dSLR substitute, Fuji hopefully will hopefully make the necessary firmware changes to allow the photographer to directly choose AF points using the rear panel button to make it as fast as a dSLR instead of the current 2-steps process.

 

Edit: I forgot to extend to you my compliments for the very nice sample photos you posted at the start of this thread.  These are very nice photos.  These were taken using the B&W setting of the E-M5 or converted in PP?  

Edited by Larry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Q3 or Q4 launch of an X-Pro2 would point to a Photokina announcement by Fuji.

 

The opportunity to directly change AF focus point on the Olympus is indeed excellent and it shows up a grid while you do it, so it's easy to orientate oneself what one is doing as well.

 

The "OK"-button has a sensible use in that it brings up many controls in the viewfinder. Same for the 2x2 control system.

 

Andrew, thanks for posting some great images. I think you capture situations and human interactions very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
Andrew L (gryphon1911)

Posted

I would put my money on an update to the X-Pro1, likely using the same 24mp sensor that Sony used in the A6000 but with the same color filter array that Fuji used with the X-trans.  Given what Fuji was able to do with the XT-1 AF even while making do with the same sensor used in the XE-2, this new model would be even better in AF performance than the XT-1.  I expect this no earlier than late 3Q or even 4Q this year.

 

Given the very good market response to the XT-1 as a dSLR substitute, Fuji hopefully will hopefully make the necessary firmware changes to allow the photographer to directly choose AF points using the rear panel button to make it as fast as a dSLR instead of the current 2-steps process.

 

Edit: I forgot to extend to you my compliments for the very nice sample photos you posted at the start of this thread.  These are very nice photos.  These were taken using the B&W setting of the E-M5 or converted in PP?  

 

 

Thank you.  I shoot in color and then use Lightroom and onOne Perfect B&W 8 for my post processing.

 

I sometimes shoot in B&W in camera, but rarely.  I'm still experimenting with the monochrome mode in the Olympus to see if I can get a B&W look that I like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
Andrew L (gryphon1911)

Posted

A Q3 or Q4 launch of an X-Pro2 would point to a Photokina announcement by Fuji.

 

The opportunity to directly change AF focus point on the Olympus is indeed excellent and it shows up a grid while you do it, so it's easy to orientate oneself what one is doing as well.

 

The "OK"-button has a sensible use in that it brings up many controls in the viewfinder. Same for the 2x2 control system.

 

Andrew, thanks for posting some great images. I think you capture situations and human interactions very well.

 

Thank you!

 

I'm not sure why I'm drawn to street photography, but I really enjoy it as a personal/side project to the event and portrait work I do professionally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite interesting, thanks. I have an X-T1 arriving hopefully today or tomorrow. The quick test of AF I've done before ordering was satisfying for me so I hope and expect that it will replace my D700 for my usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
Andrew L (gryphon1911)

Posted

Quite interesting, thanks. I have an X-T1 arriving hopefully today or tomorrow. The quick test of AF I've done before ordering was satisfying for me so I hope and expect that it will replace my D700 for my usage.

 

The X-T1 is a great camera.  I'm sure you'll love it.  

 

Depending on how you shoot and what requirements you have, the AF speed may very well be exactly what you are looking for and need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm. I seem to be a member here now.

 

I am thinking of the X-T1, from a slightly different perspective: when I had an X Pro-1, I used adapters to enjoy some Nikon manual focus lenses. Results were good not great.

 

I no longer have that camera, nor those lenses, but I do have the adapters, and some pretty good Zeiss lenses. And some Voigtlander, which are quite good, and small. So my thoughts are to get the X-T1 and uses the mf lenses on it. The new viewfinder on this camera should make manual focusing much easier...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
Andrew L (gryphon1911)

Posted (edited)

The m43 adapters are not that expensive, so I would not really factor that into the decision, but that is just me.  Either the Fuji or m43 cameras are good tools.  The trick is finding the one that fits your style of shooting the best and responds in an acceptable fashion to you.

Edited by gryphon1911
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use m43 and a couple of 43 lenses with my OM-D E-M1, so that's my AF system. For adapting manual focus F-mount lenses, which are Nikon, Zeiss and Voigtländer glass, I use a Sony A7, since the viewfinder of the A7 is the best option for manual focus glass. After I got the Sony A7, I sold off all my Nikon DSLRs. This means that I use full frame Nikon, Zeiss and Voigtländer lenses on a full frame Sony A7, and I thus use all my lenses on their native format. Leica SLR lenses can just as easily be used on a Sony A7 as any F-mount lens.

 

Manual focus Nikon super tele lenses can with advantage be used on either a Sony A7 or a Sony Nex-7 with electronic first curtain (EFC) on the shutter, since you then get rid of almost all vibration issues when shooting from a tripod. EFC is the most important important feature to be added to the live view function on cameras like the D800/E.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
Alan7140

Posted (edited)

Thanks Andrew.  I now better understand your choosing the EM-5 over the E-M1.  I have not spent much time with the E-M5 and am wondering whether there might be something there that I missed.  

 

What surprised me is how the XT-1 AF-point designation is still a 2-button press process.  This is how I understand it from my reading the blogs and you have now also confirmed it.  The X-T1 is intended as a faster dSLR mirrorless substitute and this 2-button press to designate the AF-point considerably slows down the shooting process and is thus puzzling to me.  Thank you again Andrew.

 

 

Assigning each of the four-way toggles to AF in the menu means that it becomes as near as makes no difference an instant selector. Just start pressing the direction you want to go and after the first push which turns on the points selector overlay the point starts to move. Sure you lose the different functionalities that the other three come with as default, but I guess that's the whole idea of customisable menus - you make the switches do what you want... :) (So: in Set-Up menu 2, assign the "Focus Area" to Fn3, 4, 5 & 6, and each of the 4-ways becomes dedicated to shifting the focus point - simple.)

 

Using my camera with the Fn thus allocated to the four-way switches is every bit as quick as was selecting the points on my D3s or D600 - except that the selectable points extend right to the edge of frame, not clustered together in a paranoid huddle in the centre of frame. One of the advantages, I guess, of having a sensor that is both CDAF & PADAF enabled.

 

Of course "losing" the three extra function switches by doing this is really a moot point - I'd imagine that not many cameras come (or came) with six programmable Fn switches each with 17 programmable choice options.

 

To centre the point when focus brackets are displayed, hit the "Disp Back" button just below the 4-way rather than the centre button of the 4-way as it is with the Nikon.

 

Like anything, it just takes getting used to the camera, and sometimes thinking just a bit outside the square (something that is often not intrinsic to the "reviews" and blogs out there).

 

(Edit: to expand on what I originally commented - it was late when I wrote that :) ).

Edited by Alan7140
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course I was looking at the Sony A7r, but scared off due to the shutter vibration issue. Reluctant on the A7 because of the smaller sensor and more plastic in construction.

 

What Nikon to Sony adapter would you recommend?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest bjornthun

Posted (edited)

Of course I was looking at the Sony A7r, but scared off due to the shutter vibration issue. Reluctant on the A7 because of the smaller sensor and more plastic in construction.

What Nikon to Sony adapter would you recommend?

The Sony A7 sensor is not smaller than the one in the A7R, but it is 24 megapixel compared to 36 megapixels in the A7R. Both sensors are "full frame". The Nex-7 is an APS-C on the other hand. Both the A7 and the Nex-7 ofer electronic first curtain (EFC), making them much more well suited for using tele lenses on tripods with shutter speeds from 1 sec - 1/125 sec compared to traditional focal plane shutters.

The build quality of the A7 is good and hasn't caused me any trouble so far. I do however think that the Olympus OM-D E-M1 is a better implemented camera than either of the A7 or the Nex-7, particularly with respect to controls and menu layout, even though Olympus menu system must be regarded as "comprehensive".

The Voigtländer Nikon F to Nex adapter works fine for me, but works only with lenses that have an aperture ring.

Edited by bjornthun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew:

 

Just reread your original post. Your photographs are terrific, I must say. I do, however, have a question:

 

It seems that your preference for the Olympus is seriously impacted by the AF, particularly, the ability to readily move AF points. Yet the sample photos do not seem to be those which require that feature.

 

For myself, I never move the AF point, shoot single shot on my D800, and take my time about it. (Though nothing I do approaches your efforts.) I also shoot mostly in full manual, with MF.

 

Therefore I am leaning to a Fuji XT-1 or a Sony A7 as a mirrorless addition to my kit, using my current lenses, where possible, with adapters. It just seems to me, your pictures not withstanding, that going to a m4/3 sensor is backing down on technology...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Contributor
Andrew L (gryphon1911)

Posted

I use AF-S almost exclusively on the EM5, but I am not a center point focus lock and recompose kind of shooter.  I have not shot that way since I stopped using my Nikon N90s years ago(it only has one AF point).  I frame the subject the way I want it and then move the AF point to the subject.

 

I started doing this, especially when shooting fast glass wide open and I had found that sometimes, even a small shift in the sensor plane at a wide open aperture can make a huge difference in sharpness and where the AF rests.

 

For example,

Image of the masks, was composed as you see it, and I moved the AF point to the mask on the left.

The meat counter image was focused on the customer to frame left.

The last image with the stairs and guy carrying the box was a good example of the benefit of having the AF point immediately available.  I hard originally intended to just take a picture of the stairs and had the middle AF point selected.  When I saw the guy carrying the box, I immediately selected the bottom middle AF point and got this shot.

 

Regarding, your "backing down on technology" comment...I guess I do not fully understand what you mean by that.

 

I have no problems carrying my Nikon gear with me when I know I am going to go out and shoot.  Generally, that is now with the Nikon Df.  I also wanted another kit that I can keep with me all the time for those unexpected moments.  I tried using the Fuji gear, and they provide great image quality - no question....but the speed of function and AF was an issue for me.  I need something that doesn't get in my way.  The Olympus OMD seems to have fit that bill for me better than the Fuji.  The OMD functions fast and with the 17mm/45mm primes, AF is almost instant.  The 17 and EM5 can be placed in a coat or cargo pant pocket if I need to go ultra light.

 

I'm still wanting a Fuji X100....someday....but that will most likely be a side acquisition - something I get used, kind of thing.

 

I guess I am a very "in the moment" type shooter, and feel most comfortable when I put myself into the chaos and find then cull the shots I want from the chaos.  I've camped street scenes before and have had some success there, too....its just not my favorite thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • waltonksm
      By waltonksm
      Another "non-technical review."  Yes, the zoom range is fantastic. But if you start enlarging the images, I find they are not particularly sharp. I am talking about landscape shots.  I have not done any macro shots with this yet. Frankly, had I spent more time with the lens after purchasing, I think I would have sent this one back.  Perhaps I got a "dud?"
    • Dallas
      By Dallas
      Durban recently hosted its 10th annual Durban International Blues Festival at the lively Zack’s Wilson’s Wharf venue on the Bay. I’ve been fortunate enough to photograph the Fender evening on a few occasions, but this year it was extra special because my son and his Rock Academy band were one of the acts. They played 2 numbers on the night, namely “House Of The Rising Sun” by the Animals and “Before You Accuse Me” by Eric Clapton (I think he wrote it?). Very proud moment for me. Sometimes I find myself living vicariously… not such a bad thing coz I sure as hell wouldn’t ever have the nerve to get up on a stage in front of a lot of people and entertain them. No sir. I gots me some issues with stage confidence.
       
      I love photographing bands and performers though. Over the years I have accumulated quite a few images of artists who played on various stages. I’d love to put on an exhibition of these works someday. Photographing live music is not easy, but I have managed to perfect my own method which sort of comes naturally to me. A lot of photographers struggle with things like metering methods, colour balance, auto focus and whatever else the camera battles with when left to its own devices. I’ve come to know my cameras over the years, wringing the best out of them wherever possible and recently with my move to the Olympus micro four thirds system I find I am just getting better and better shots as the technology improves. The things I lean on are the new fast lenses that the smaller m43 format has brought us, in particular the Olympus 75mm f/1.8, the ability to shoot at high ISO and get a usable image and image stabilisation. Without those three elements you’re going to be in for a lot of disappointment as far as shot quality goes (and I’m seeing that evident in the work of others who cover the same events I do).
       
      That said, there’s also a lot to be said for personal experience. I recently discovered something that the Olympus cameras do that kind of makes low light photography a lot easier. On the Olympus bodies you’ll find this thing called a Shadow Spot Meter. I accidentally activated this while on safari recently while we were photographing this pack of stinky hyenas at Sabi Sabi. It was night time and the only lights we had on the scene were the spotlights that the trackers use. I usually auto float my ISO values between 100 and 8000 on the Olympus E-M1 but I couldn’t understand why I was getting decent exposures at low ISO values of 400 and sometimes even 200 in such dim conditions. It didn’t make sense to me, yet there I was looking at these great shots on the back of the camera and zoomed in at pixel level I had hardly any noise. So I tried using that metering method on the stage at this years festival and it worked well there too. Yes, the rest of the scene goes quite dark, but your subject gets just the right amount of exposure if you’re looking for that low key, moody look. Just so happens that I like that. A lot. See if you can pick out which of these shots got the shadow spot treatment.
       

      My boy playing a Fender Telecaster (he usually plays a Charvel, but with it being a Fender evening he was handed this job and got on with it.
       

      Their lead guitarist, Rorke.
       

      16-year-old Cyndi didn't get the memo about it being a Fender evening (nice Guild though)
       

      My buddy Reg (also a photographer) and Roland
       

      Sadly I do not know what this fellas name is. But he sure could sing them blues.
       

      Eloise, awesome vocalist and vocals tutor.
       

      My good friend and all round good guy, John.
       

      From Chicago, USA Mr. Charlie Rose, singer of the blues.
       

       

      Reg's very talented son, Rowan Stuart. Look him up on iTunes.
       

      Another multi-talented guy, Andy Turrell (former drummer for Dan Patlansky).

      View full article
    • Dallas
      By Dallas
      Durban recently hosted its 10th annual Durban International Blues Festival at the lively Zack’s Wilson’s Wharf venue on the Bay. I’ve been fortunate enough to photograph the Fender evening on a few occasions, but this year it was extra special because my son and his Rock Academy band were one of the acts. They played 2 numbers on the night, namely “House Of The Rising Sun” by the Animals and “Before You Accuse Me” by Eric Clapton (I think he wrote it?). Very proud moment for me. Sometimes I find myself living vicariously… not such a bad thing coz I sure as hell wouldn’t ever have the nerve to get up on a stage in front of a lot of people and entertain them. No sir. I gots me some issues with stage confidence.
       
      I love photographing bands and performers though. Over the years I have accumulated quite a few images of artists who played on various stages. I’d love to put on an exhibition of these works someday. Photographing live music is not easy, but I have managed to perfect my own method which sort of comes naturally to me. A lot of photographers struggle with things like metering methods, colour balance, auto focus and whatever else the camera battles with when left to its own devices. I’ve come to know my cameras over the years, wringing the best out of them wherever possible and recently with my move to the Olympus micro four thirds system I find I am just getting better and better shots as the technology improves. The things I lean on are the new fast lenses that the smaller m43 format has brought us, in particular the Olympus 75mm f/1.8, the ability to shoot at high ISO and get a usable image and image stabilisation. Without those three elements you’re going to be in for a lot of disappointment as far as shot quality goes (and I’m seeing that evident in the work of others who cover the same events I do).
       
      That said, there’s also a lot to be said for personal experience. I recently discovered something that the Olympus cameras do that kind of makes low light photography a lot easier. On the Olympus bodies you’ll find this thing called a Shadow Spot Meter. I accidentally activated this while on safari recently while we were photographing this pack of stinky hyenas at Sabi Sabi. It was night time and the only lights we had on the scene were the spotlights that the trackers use. I usually auto float my ISO values between 100 and 8000 on the Olympus E-M1 but I couldn’t understand why I was getting decent exposures at low ISO values of 400 and sometimes even 200 in such dim conditions. It didn’t make sense to me, yet there I was looking at these great shots on the back of the camera and zoomed in at pixel level I had hardly any noise. So I tried using that metering method on the stage at this years festival and it worked well there too. Yes, the rest of the scene goes quite dark, but your subject gets just the right amount of exposure if you’re looking for that low key, moody look. Just so happens that I like that. A lot. See if you can pick out which of these shots got the shadow spot treatment.
       

      My boy playing a Fender Telecaster (he usually plays a Charvel, but with it being a Fender evening he was handed this job and got on with it.
       

      Their lead guitarist, Rorke.
       

      16-year-old Cyndi didn't get the memo about it being a Fender evening (nice Guild though)
       

      My buddy Reg (also a photographer) and Roland
       

      Sadly I do not know what this fellas name is. But he sure could sing them blues.
       

      Eloise, awesome vocalist and vocals tutor.
       

      My good friend and all round good guy, John.
       

      From Chicago, USA Mr. Charlie Rose, singer of the blues.
       

       

      Reg's very talented son, Rowan Stuart. Look him up on iTunes.
       

      Another multi-talented guy, Andy Turrell (former drummer for Dan Patlansky).
    • Hugh_3170
      By Hugh_3170
      This anticipated new model in the Olympus E-M1 line up has been released.
       
      Some links:
       
      https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympus-om-d-e-m1-mark-iii-initial-review
       
      https://www.olympus.com.au/product/dslr/em1mk3/index.html
       
      It will be interesting to see how this new comer stacks up against its predecessors, especially in the stills IQ department.
       
      (Meanwhile Nikon have released their new D6 - in good time for the summer Olympics in Tokyo later this year.)
    • Dallas
      By Dallas
      Working With Olympus FL-600R Flashes
      I’ve had two of these small, but fully functional FL-600R flashes pretty much since I started shooting with Olympus full time and have done a fair amount of work with them, including small product photography and portraiture as well as some event coverage. To follow is a basic overview of how the flashes work and also how I use them.
       
      FL-600R Features
      After previously using a couple of Nikon SB-800 and SB-900 speedlights, getting these little things was quite a shock. They are minute compared to standard speedlights from Nikon and Canon. One of them is probably about half (or less) the size of an SB-900. However, in spite of their diminutive size, they offer much the same functionality of the Nikon CLS system.
       
      The heads zoom according to the focal length of the lens you are using, they tilt and swivel too, allowing for bounce flash, plus there is also a wide angle diffraction panel built in along with a very small white bounce card (too small to be meaningful).
       
      On the back of the unit is an LCD panel showing the various settings. This also has a backlight, but it needs to be activated manually - it doesn’t turn on when the flash is activated by the camera, which I think is something they should fix in firmware. There is a rotating selector wheel with directional key pad built in.
       
      The units come in a nice nylon case and included is a plastic stand for remote use. Missing is a clip on diffuser. I’m not sure if you can buy one to fit these small units. Maybe somebody in China is making them?


      The one feature that this flash has which I haven’t encountered on any other portable unit is a built in LED for video. It can be set up to shine at various strengths from 1/1 down to 1/16 of its power. I can tell you that if you have this thing set to shine at 1/1 you are going to blind people. It’s very bright!
       
      The flash has several modes you can set it to:
       
      A mode - auto mode operates much the same as it does on any other portable flash unit. The sensor in the front of the unit reads how much light is being reflected back to it from the subject and when it thinks it has pushed out enough power it cuts itself off. It works pretty well with the OM-D cameras and provided you have it properly set up on your Super Control Panel (as fill-in flash, not Auto) you should get a decent exposure for snapshot type photos.
       
      M mode - the FL-600R has full manual mode which is good news for any strobist. You can adjust the power from 1/1 all the way down to 1/128.
       
      FP-TTL A mode - like most advanced flash units this one has the FP mode, which lets you sync flash up to the maximum shutter speed of the camera (1/8000s in the case of the OM-D range). This mode also passes full control of flash output to the camera, hence the TTL.
       
      TTL - A mode - as per above, except that you are now limiting the flash to the max sync speed of the OM-D.
       
      FP - M mode - full manual control but with the ability to sync at any shutter speed.
       
      RC mode - remote control mode lets you set up the flash so that it is completely controlled by the camera when it is standing free. This is the equivalent of Nikon’s CLS mode where you can have several flashes working in three different groups. I’ll go into more detail on this later in the article.
       
      SL - A mode - this is the slave mode combined with A mode (mentioned above). Not to be confused with RC mode, slave mode is where the unit waits to receive an optical trigger from any other flash unit and then pumps out light based on what it gets back from the sensor in the front of the unit.
       
      SL- M mode - this is your quintessential “strobist” mode where the flash uses its built int optical slave and lets the photographer decide how much power it should dump out with each burst. Nikon users will know this as SU-4 mode on their speedlights.
       
      Flash compensation is possible either from the camera or manually from the flash unit. This has a pretty wide range going from -5.0 all the way up to +5.0 stops.
      The zoom can be set to change automatically or manually from 12mm up to 42mm.
       
      The LED light can be set up to come on automatically to assist with auto focus acquisition in low light, or you can toggle it on or off manually. It’s also possible to set the strength of the light in the custom functions of the FL-600R.
       
      Just on the LED settings; it can be very confusing to set this up to operate as an AF assist light because you have to co-ordinate settings on both the speedlight and the camera. Buried deep in the Olympus menu labyrinth is a setting for AF Illuminat. You have to set this to on. Then you have to go into the FL-600R’s custom settings by holding down the OK button for 2 seconds, find the setting that reads ILL and make sure that says A. Then, once you have done those two things you need to adjust the LED settings on the back panel of the flash to the A setting too. Only then will it automatically shine the LED to assist with auto focus.
       
      And before you do this you really need to make sure that you have turned the power of the LED down to a reasonable level otherwise your subjects are going to be squinting horribly at you. Trust me on this - it’s not pretty! It’s a better idea to use the orange AF assist light of the OM-D than this thing, although that may also frustrate you as it can be distracting. I suppose once you are used to changing these settings in their respective places it isn’t as complicated as it sounds, but I have switched this “feature” off and set the flash to manually turn the LED light on or off. I find that at a lower power setting this is far less distracting to a subject and also provides enough illumination when you’re in a dark room. The downside is that when you turn it on what you’re doing suddenly becomes the centre of attention, just like shining a spotlight on a stage.
       
      Working With On Camera Flash
       
      The FL-600R compliments the OM-D cameras quite nicely. It’s well balanced and once you have decided which mode you want to use, you can get good results on a consistent basis. It’s getting to the comfort level of operation that takes a bit of getting used to. As with anything, practise makes perfect.
       
      Regular readers will know that I was a huge fan of Nikon’s iTTL metering with SB speedlights. Put one of the SB units onto any Nikon camera, stick it in iTTL and your results are going to be spot on, 99% of the time, which takes the stress out of using on-camera flash completely. While the Olympus FL-600R also offers through the lens (TTL-A) metering the results are nowhere near as consistently good as Nikon’s. I find that the exposures in TTL A mode are usually under exposed by at least a stop and they also don’t respond well to bounced flash. I get widely varying results in this mode.
       
      If I am shooting events I opt for M mode and using a bounce card attached to the flash I shoot in full manual mode, using a shutter speed and ISO rating that will allow ambient light to bleed in at a wide(ish) aperture. I’ll set the flash to a power setting that feels right and then I will adjust aperture until I am happy with the balance between subject and the ambient. It’s a little more primitive than using TTL mode, but once you get the hang of it you will feel a lot more like a real photographer. If I’m in a rush and I don’t have time to do any tests I will most likely use A mode with a bounce card and this works fairly well too.
       

      Above is an example of using manual flash settings in manual mode on the camera. Below is an example of using A mode where shutter speed was slowed and ISO boosted to allow more ambient in. Click to enlarge.
       

       
      Working With Off Camera Flash
       
      RC Mode
      Using the FL-600R off camera is where the home strobist will begin to enjoy the flexibility of these little flashes. As with the Nikon CLS system it is possible to set up an unlimited number of flash units that can be controlled from the camera in three groups, A, B & C on a common channel. From the camera you can use the little clip on flashes that come with the OM-D (or the pop-up in the case of E-M10 and certain PEN models) to act as the commander for the FL-600R. Or you can use another FL-600R as a commander.
       
      Each group can be set to fire in any of the TTL, Auto, Manual or FP modes (TTL and M), so you can have a mix of these modes in different groups. For example, if I have a couple of the FL-600R’s on a white background I can set those to be in group A and have them firing in manual mode to keep the power on the background constant. Then I could have another FL-600R set to Auto or TTL mode on my subject in group B or C. The advantage of this is that I can control all the flashes from the Super Control Panel on the OM-D as well as adjust power settings for each group. It’s very cool.
       
      The image below is an example of the outcome of such a set up but using only one FL-600R for the background and another for the subject. Click to enlarge.
       

       
      From a practical stance this setup works quite well indoors in a smallish studio, but in larger environs or outdoors you may battle to get the remote flashes to see the commander pulses as the sensor is in the front of the unit. A workaround is to swivel the heads all the way around so that the sensor is facing the commander. This works fine in TTL and manual modes but will confuse the A mode as the flash will not be getting the proper bounce back from the subject that it uses to determine when to stop sending out power.
       
      Before I invested in a couple of sets of studio strobes I used the two little FL-600R units to produce my usual run-off-the-mill 2 light small product photography setup. If I want to do a very quick basic setup I still use the Olympus flashes in a small light tent cube I have and I am quite happy with the results using manual mode in remote control. It saves me having to set up the big lights with all the stands and softboxes, etc.
       

      Above we see a single FL-600R used to illuminate the edge of the knife. Below a second FL-600R is added to produce the main key light. Click to enlarge.
       

       
      Slave Mode
      Slave mode is different to the RC mode in that you are effectively turning the FL-600R into a dumb unit that fires only in A or M modes and is triggered whenever it sees another flash. This means it can be used in conjunction with any other kind of flash units that are firing simultaneously. Strobist stuff. I sometimes use them on clamps with spigots for setups where I might need another light attached to a part of the set that doesn’t allow for a light stand to be set up. They work well like this.
       

      Above shot shows how I sometimes use an FL-600R to light a white background (or other things) for product photos.
       
      Product Observations
       
      The problems that present themselves with small flashes come down to power. These units are fine for general snapshot type, on-camera photography, but if you are looking to light up an entire room with a single flash you’re going to have to push your ISO up or invest in a fair number of these units to make it all work. Price might be an issue with that idea as these sell for $300 each. Sure, while these units are a bit cheaper than the Nikon and Canon flashes that offer the same degree of flexibility, they are more expensive than equally capable Chinese brand flashes such as the Yongnuo’s. Granted those units will only work in manual mode and don’t offer the RC mode but therein lies most of the fun in strobism - manual mode.
       
      The only thing that these FL-600R units don’t offer is a sync port, so attaching radio triggers that only offer cable connectivity to remote units for outdoor use means you will have to invest in a hot-shoe adapter that has a sync port built in.
       
      Recycle time is pretty good. I use the GP Recycko AA cells in mine and unless I have forgotten to charge them up before a shoot, I get good recycle times. If you have an older Olympus E-series camera you will be happy to learn that this flash is fully compatible with those cameras too. I used it on both the E-3 and E-30 when I had them.
       
      Improvements I would like to see are a simpler interface with the camera and also easier controls to use on the flash itself. The custom settings don’t make a lot of sense unless you have them memorised. Olympus could also provide a much better user manual for such a complex device. Another thing that could be improved is to provide some kind of audible sound to show that the light has recycled when it is off camera. In remote mode the LED blinks when the flash is ready to fire, but this can be distracting so I would prefer to have a beep (that can also be turned off when it isn’t wanted).
       
      As mentioned at the start of this article, the FL-600R compliments the OM-D range quite nicely and gives you a lot of flexibility to get creative with bounce flash and also off-camera flash. They are very small and light so they don’t take up a lot of space in a camera bag either. If you have an OM-D and are looking for something better than the clip on flash (or pop-up in the case of the E-M10) this FL-600R should suit your needs very well. It may take a little getting used to, but once you have the hang of it you wil be able to use it quite creatively. All in all these units show that the Olympus micro four thirds system is very well fleshed out and mature. There is little you can't accomplish with it.
       
  • Join Our Small Community

    Like what you see on Fotozones? Join up here and make friends with like-minded photography enthusiasts from all across the planet without having to sell your soul to the Facebook monster. We are limiting our membership to no more than 2000 individuals, so if you are seeing this message there is still space available for you to join. We'd love to have you along. :)  

     

     



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By visiting this website you are agreeing to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy & Guidelines.