Jump to content
  • Shooting Straight


    Dallas

    image.jpegThe reality of being a professional photographer is that (for me at least) the opportunities to enjoy taking photos for yourself become somewhat limited in number. There are a variety of reasons for this, chief among them in my case is the fact that whenever I pick up a camera these days it feels like I am going to work, so laying my hands on the tools of the trade doesn’t bring with it the kind of excitement I used to feel when I was an amateur photographer. Instead it brings about a thought process that is anything but leisurely in nature. If I have my cameras in my hands I’m usually thinking about pleasing clients rather than myself.

     

    In fact, camera gear has become so banal to me over the 15 years since I declared myself open for business as a photographer that I literally only own the bare necessities these days. 4 lenses and 2 bodies. That’s it. Really. Everything I need to do my job is there.

     

    That was until just before Christmas 2022 when something new, but old entered the scene.

     

    Alan Lesheim (@Alan7140) and I have exchanged many lengthy private messages over the 10 years since he became a member of Fotozones. We were both early adopters of the mirrorless revolution in photography, with me going down the Micro Four Thirds route and Alan the Fujifilm one. We have developed a “pen-pal” kind of friendship that I really appreciate, because if I ever need to know anything about photography he is my go to guy. After reading my November newsletter wherein I expressed a desire to start taking photos for myself again by perhaps investing in a Fujifilm X100 sometime in the future, Alan reached out and offered to send me his original Fujifilm X100 as a gift since he wasn’t going to use it again. I would just need to get some batteries for it as the originals were no longer serviceable.

     

    Wow! Talk about suddenly finding impetus amidst the mire to engage in personal photography and gear lust again! Ordinarily I wouldn’t have accepted this generous offer because of the terrible situation with the postal service in my country. There is maybe a 50/50 chance of any parcel sent from abroad actually getting to me when using the PO, such is the level of corruption and thievery going on there.

     

    But then I remembered that a very good friend of mine was working a contract as a care-giver in Wales until the end of November and would be coming home to SA just before Christmas. I asked him if he wouldn’t mind receiving the parcel for me and then bringing it with him. He happily agreed to do this, so Alan then sent the camera to him and thus began a countdown as to whether it would get there in time before he went to his next assignment in Essex, England. As luck would have it the package arrived with him literally the day before the UK Postal workers went on strike.

     

    After sourcing two 3rd party batteries and a USB charger from Amazon for less than £20 all I had to do was wait for Nigel to get back home, which with all the other strikes that are going on in the UK these days started to look a bit sketchy. But he made it back and I collected the X100 from him on the 23rd of December.

     

    From the moment I held the camera in my hands I knew that I was going to love using it. It truly is a unique and masterfully engineered piece of kit, but what I wasn’t quite expecting was the exquisite image quality that comes with this little package. I mean, yes, I had read enough about it over the years to know that this range of cameras has achieved a near cult status among users since it first hit the market, but the images I am seeing from this “mere” 12MP Bayer sensor are just different to anything I get from my MFT kit. The colours are more lifelike and the rendering has this kind of 3D effect that reminds me of my days shooting with Leica 35mm rangefinders. Maybe it’s all in my mind, but I know that I like it. I like it a lot.

     

    To begin with there was the obligatory random snapping around the house to get to grips with how everything worked on the X100. It didn’t take me long to familiarise myself with the menu and the few buttons it has. It’s wonderfully simple (unlike the Panasonic G9 I have had for the past 2 years that still has me scratching my head when I need to quickly change a setting somewhere). Operationally you have your aperture ring, a shutter speed dial and an exposure compensation dial. A couple of other buttons on the back and the top plate give you all you need to make whatever other adjustments are necessary to take a pleasing photograph. The D pad and ring around it are actually very similar to what I remember from the Olympus Pen series cameras I have had over the years, just better implemented, it seems. The X100 just feels right. It feels the way a camera should feel to me. It makes me want to go and enjoy photography again, which means that it has already “done its job” of getting me thinking about personal photography again.

     

    DSCF9474.jpg

     

    DSCF9471-Edit-Edit-Edit.jpg

    These interesting flowers only open at night. 

     

    DSCF9473.jpg

    They grow on a vine that lives on this fence between us and the construction site. 

     

    The way I have it set up now is to shoot in JPG (fine) + RAW. The Fuji JPG’s are brilliant, but I am always going to want a RAW file to play around with in Lightroom. I have set the top Fn button to activate the built in ND filter, so I can shoot outdoors at f/2.0 and not blow the exposure, then the RAW button is set to select the film simulation for the JPG, since I am always going to have a RAW file captured alongside the JPG. I use Auto-ISO in Aperture priority mode with a minimum shutter speed of 1/30 before it bumps the ISO to the next higher level. The auto ISO mode seems to top out at ISO 3200. You can however select a higher ISO when shooting in regular ISO mode, just not Auto.

     

    If I am honest I find that this camera is much more responsive than my 2018 Panasonic G9. It turns on faster, it displays the shot you’ve just taken much faster and it’s also a lot faster to zoom in on the image than it is on the G9. The AF is not as fast but it is a lot snappier than I have read about it in reviews. The one thing that I do find a little awkward to work with is changing the AF point. To do this you have to press the AF button on the left side of the camera and then use the D pad on the right side to navigate to the point you want to use. It is a bit clumsy to operate this way as you need two hands, but I’ll get used to it.

     

    Other things I have come to love in the short time I have had it are the tiny little flash, which is fuss-free and offers a decent amount of well balanced fill flash for casual use. Images shot with the flash active actually don’t look like they have been flash lit at all. The macro function is also nice and allows you to get the lens up much closer to a subject, but it isn’t a real macro magnification. Focus confirmation is also different to what I am used to. There is no green dot in the viewfinder, instead the focus point turns green when it has achieved focus. The readout also tells you how far away your subject is, which is the first time I have seen that in any camera.

     

    Something I probably won’t use much is the optical view finder. The hybrid OVF/EVF was the big talking point when the X100 and X-Pro 1 were released and it remains a pretty unique feature of the Fujifilm cameras in this rangefinder style. I suppose this is probably useful in dimly lit situations where an EVF might battle a bit, but for me personally I’d rather have a poor EVF that shows me more or less what the image is going to look like before I take it than an unwanted surprise afterwards where I have totally messed up the exposure.

     

    So where is my personal photography journey headed now that I am officially inducted into the Fujifilm owners club? As a former GAS sufferer the first thing I did when Alan said he was sending me this little gem is start researching the entire Fujifilm line-up. What lenses are there? What bodies would be best suited to my work? Can I use the system in the same way that I use the MFT system? Then all at once I scolded myself and resolved to only consider the Fujifilm system for my personal photography. There is nothing to be gained by selling off my MFT equipment and replacing it with similar equipment from a different brand. Not a single client will notice and I certainly won’t be able to charge more for photographs made on a slightly larger sensor than the one I have been using for the past 10 years.

     

    What I can do though, is simply enjoy the process of making photography for myself with a proper camera again. The X100 will become my trustworthy side-kick whenever I go somewhere and I want to bring back some photos. It lets me get what I need without becoming a nuisance or hindrance to what I want to record. It’s all I will ever need to keep me interested in doing the thing that made me pick up a camera in the first place.

     

    Thank you, Alan!

     

    Here are some personal shots made over Christmas Day and around the house.

     

    DSCF9214.jpg

     

    Stress relief for my son who still lives at home. 

     

    DSCF9235.jpg

     

    Stress relief for his Dad.

     

    DSCF9292.jpg

     

    Me and the Missus.

     

    DSCF9313.jpg

     

    When it rains on Christmas, make a ginger bread house. 

     

    DSCF9318.jpg

     

    DSCF9380.jpg

     

    DSCF9401.jpg

     

    DSCF9406.jpg

     

    DSCF9413.jpg

     

    DSCF9422.jpg

     

    DSCF9429.jpg

     

    The kids had great fun building it up, but the eating thereof didn't go down so well! 

     

    • Like 4
    • Applaud 1

    Comments

    Recommended Comments

    • Contributor

    There are few things more satisfying in this photography game than seeing disused equipment being rejuvenated and repurposed  and being put to use again, I reckon. Digital by its very nature usually seems to discourage this with rapid obsolescence, and maybe Fuji inadvertently tripped up with the original X100 by providing something that was seen as almost a joke at the time but now has achieved veritable cult status. I'm having a similar experience with some of the film cameras I started buying and using again a few years back, most notably the Pentacon Six TL bodies and Carl Zeiss Jena lenses it uses. Always looked at as a huge Communist prank being played on the West at the time, I've found the Pentacon system to be addictive equipment in actual use, and surprisingly reliable after a simple grease and oil change and service. Unlike modern lenses, the lenses, too, are relatively easy to dismantle and replace old and perished grease with just some simple hand tools.

     

    In fact I no longer hanker after replacing the Hasselblad gear I sold off back in 2006 to finance the beginnings of a string of overpriced Nikon "Pro" digital cameras (average time of Nikon D ownership before obsolescence - about 2 years). Even though I'd used primarily Hasselblad equipment from 1972-1977, and again from 1996-2006, I never really actually enjoyed using the equipment. Sure it was reliable, produced good results and impressed clients (maybe that was an important thing, maybe not), but it never really "grew" on me.

     

    In the later '70's the Mamiya RZ/RB 6x7 cameras became the "expected standard" camera when I switched from advertising photography to weddings/portraiture etc, but if ever there was a camera system I actually hated using, the Mamiya R was it. So I'd offloaded it all by the mid-1980's. By then my business was full-time copy and restoration using 5"x4" film and Toyo Field 45A with Rodenstock lenses, when I moved to Tasmania and kept that going as a reduced mail-order model along with getting back into weddings, which by then had become 35mm film-based using a Nikon F4 along with a Hasselblad for B&W stuff.

     

    Until digital reared its ugly head, that is, and by 2006 I was on the buy/upgrade/trade-in/upgrade digital treadmill.

     

    Around 2010 Hartblei announced that they'd be releasing a tilt/shift adapter for Mamiya RB/RZ lenses to Nikon F mount, so I pre-emptively bought some still new-in-boxes RZ lenses, an RZ body, plus an RB67 with 90mm lens all attached from KEH whilst waiting for that adapter - which never materialised as Hartblei couldn't translate their design into a manufactured item, apparently. I've even forgotten why I even needed tilt/shift ability on my Nikon D cameras.

     

    So buying some film for the RZ to somewhat justify all this medium format stuff I really didn't want, I was quickly reminded me in short order why I had hated that Mamiya gear. Cumbersome, weighty, totally unergonomic and awkward to use, the whole lot is now on a long-term barter with my mechanic as he works off buying the camera outfit by servicing my car. He loves the camera, but then he specialises in Jaguar and Land Rover vehicles, so.... glutton for punishment, maybe?

     

     So the circle closes for me, even though it's true I just bought a Fujifilm X-T5 and 30mm Macro lens. Not because I think digital is the way to finish my life with photography, but with its pixel-shift feature the X-T5 produces 160MP single image copies of my 5x7 and half-plate film and paper negatives (mostly taken with cameras and lenses largely sourced from the "tip-shops" at various public rubbish tips and having given me additional satisfaction by restoring these things to working order), and which can produce perfect A2 prints without having to stitch sections together to get true large format quality (sure I'd like to actually print the negs in the darkroom, but aside from lacking the floor space for a 5x7 enlarger, simply finding one of those in serviceable condition these days at an affordable price would be like winning a jackpot lottery, so really the only satisfactory way to print paper negatives is to copy them digitally and print them on an Epson). So the X-T5 & lens are simply a means to an end, if you like.

     

    Between these old field cameras and the Pentacon outfit I'm actually really enjoying taking photographs again - it's similar to the equipment I was using all through the beginnings of my career, what attracted me to the profession, and what I understand and love about photography. So therein lies the similarity with what Dallas is experiencing.

     

    I'll admit that I originally bought the X100 Dallas is now making good use of on impulse because it looked so much like the first serious camera I ever used (my Dad's pre-war Leica IIIc), sitting in the showroom in its black presentation box looking all silver and pretty. The only problem for me, if it could be called that, was the fixed lens. I've always used interchangeable lens cameras or at least those with built-in zoom lens (even that old Leica IIIc had 35mm 50mm & 100mm lenses), and the x100's fixed 23mm slightly-wide lens, as outstanding as it is quality-wise, didn't really suit me. So when I got serious with Fuji and its first ILC X-Pro1 camera, initially with three lenses, the little X100 fell into disuse. So now there it is, having made an enormous, circuitous but safe journey (coincidentally to the country of my birth), happily being used again a decade after it fell into disuse here. What's not to like about that?

     

     

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • Administrators
    11 hours ago, Alan7140 said:

    The only problem for me, if it could be called that, was the fixed lens. I've always used interchangeable lens cameras or at least those with built-in zoom lens (even that old Leica IIIc had 35mm 50mm & 100mm lenses), and the x100's fixed 23mm slightly-wide lens, as outstanding as it is quality-wise, didn't really suit me.

     

    It was also what initially put me off the concept back when it was launched, not because I couldn't change the lens, but because I couldn't zoom it. That said, I have always really liked the 62˚ angle of view so this doesn't really bother me that much for subjects that are not a long way away. 

     

    If I do well this year and can justify the expense, I might just get an XE-4 later on with a wide angle zoom and then perhaps sometime even later a short telephoto for portraits (56mm 1.4 looks to be the likely suspect there). My old ThinkTank Retrospective 5 bag would easily allow me to carry those items, together with the X100 and not feel weighed down at all. 

     

    For now I am enjoying the desire to use a great camera on a personal level again. There are a few accessories I would like to get, which unfortunately don't seem to be around anymore, namely the thumb rest that fits in the hotshoe and a proper hand strap. I am using a strap from a LED Lenser flashlight I have had for many years and the connection point doesn't inspire me with a lot of confidence to let it take the full weight of the X100. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Welcome to the world of dials!😉

     

    I think we sometimes get so focussed on objectives and often forget the process is important too.  Twiddling with the dials on a Fuji body is part of the process (although it does help that they have done a good job with sensors and colours too).  I guess it’s a bit like making tea in a pot, rather than just dunking a teabag in a mug.

     

    If a Fuji interchangeable lens set-up is something you really want and you want to keep the light and portable aspect of the X100, think carefully about your lens choices - an f1.something prime soon gets to be big and bulky, will the f2 be good enough for you.  If I didn’t already have the 27 pancake, I might have gone with more of them.  Similarly, zooms can get bulky quickly too.  The 18-55 is the smallest and often described as a ‘kit’ lens, but is generally pretty good.  Wider or longer means bigger!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • Administrators

    For sure, Chris. I don't think I would want to ever carry around a massive camera system for my personal pleasure again. Not even for work, to be honest! The X100 now has the fastest lens I own at f/2.0. :) 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • Administrators
    6 hours ago, BillM said:

    X100 series cameras are fantastic!  I only wish for IBIS because of my tremor.  

     

    I was concerned that I too might struggle with that after 10 years of shooting only with IBIS but surprisingly it hasn’t been a problem for me. I suppose if you are suffering with tremors that is a different story though. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My tremor makes any task requiring fine motor control a challenge.  My workarounds are to use a minimum shutter speed of 1/125 for handheld shooting with the X100's and to brace the camera as well as I can without a tripod.

     

    Many of my favorite family pictures have come from these cameras. JPG files from the camera are good, and they usually need only a little tweaking in LightRoom.  Here is one taken in strong contrasty light.

     

    DSCF2435-X3.jpg  

    Edited by BillM
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By visiting this website you are agreeing to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy & Guidelines.