Jump to content




The above adverts really do help Fotozones. Please click on them if they are relevant to you. Not seeing them? Just exclude Fotozones from your ad blocker. Thanks!


Photo
- - - - -

Nikon 28mm f/2 AI, AIS


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

Poll: Rate this lens (57 member(s) have cast votes)

Rate this lens

  1. 1 Star (appalling) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2 Stars (below par) (1 votes [1.72%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.72%

  3. Voted 3 Stars (average) (3 votes [5.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.17%

  4. Voted 4 Stars (above average) (21 votes [36.21%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.21%

  5. 5 Stars (outstanding) (33 votes [56.90%])

    Percentage of vote: 56.90%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 Andrew

Andrew

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 977 posts
  • LocationBrodnica

Posted 01 July 2010 - 14:35

Got this lens a few days ago, AI-d it, some results....
Looks like I am not able to focus properly at f2, maybe my old age, 2.8 looks OK.

#22 stenrasmussen

stenrasmussen

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 5,064 posts
  • LocationStavanger
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 01 July 2010 - 14:50

As I haven't tried my AIS version on DX I can't comment towards my own pics but it looks good Andrew...the fourth one in particular!
The focus is tricky sometimes and if you rely on the focus indicator dot try to focus in from both the far and near end to see what gives the best result. There is some slack in the accuracy of that dot indicator.
I actually prefer to shot at 2.8. f/2 is a little bit more nervous wrt. bokeh if the lighting is not "perfect".


Machina fotografica necesse est

#23 addieleman

addieleman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 22 July 2010 - 19:33

I had this lens only briefly, sold it because I didn't like it at all neither on the F3 nor on the D200. It was soft at f/2 and only got acceptable but not great at f/5.6; it must have been a lemon as most other people like this lens a lot. I replaced it by a Vivitar 28mm f/1.9 that was flary but sharp at f/1.9 and very good at f/2.8.
Best regards, Ad.

My home page

#24 Pouncer

Pouncer

    Member

  • Life Member
  • 13 posts
  • LocationMemphis, Tennessee
  • Edit my pics?:Yes

Posted 01 July 2011 - 02:27

I bought this lens (Ai), to a large degree, based upon the recommendations of others on Nikon Gear. What a great lens. It quickly became one of my favorites. I primarily use it on a D700, and also on a D300.

Edited by Pouncer, 01 July 2011 - 02:28 .

Garrett

#25 tony_a

tony_a

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 02 September 2011 - 21:15

This is one of those rare lenses whose images you feel you can just fall into. It makes a natural pair with the old 85mm f/1.8 Ai. Both are slightly low in contrast when wide open but they are both superior just one click down.

When I received mine it had an incorrectly adjusted infinity focus stop which was taken care of at a non-Nikon service house for $40. Now I can trust the focus limit even at f/2.

I use it starting at f/2.8 due to some loss of contrast wide open. At f/4 it's amazing, at 5.6-8 it's stunning, easily out-resolving the D90 sensor. However I use it on a D700 to get the full angular coverage. The extreme corners are a little soft on FX at f/5.6 and wider. The center and all borders (minus those farthest bits of corner) always look good. It is extremely resistant to ghosting.

I feel that it is a privilege to shoot with this lens.

#26 smhese

smhese

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 80 posts
  • LocationBerlin

Posted 18 February 2012 - 11:23

Bought the lens (AIS version) out of curiosity and have to say: I wasn't disappointed.
The lens is a bit softer at @f2 but switching to f2.8 makes a big difference. The lens is wonderful sharp and contrast is great @f2.8 and it doesn't get much better if you close down to f4. Corner performance on DX is great. At f2.0 the lens creates a very nice bokeh.
I will definitely keep the lens for these macro&background out-of-focus concepts. The picture below shows bokeh balls from two different f2.0 shots that were merged using layers in PS.

Sören


MerryXmas-8102.jpg

#27 Vilk

Vilk
  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 00:17

This is one magical lens. I had had the "good" 2.8 for a decade and a half before switching to 2 last summer. Not only did I use the 2.8 once a year--if that--I even developed a whole I'm-not-a-28-guy-and-it's-a-lousy-length-anyway theory. Since the swap, the 28/2 has not left my camera for five minutes, becoming my "standard" lens and giving me some of the best frames in my oeuvre.

Posted Image
Brzezina by Acheiropoietes, on Flickr

#28 afoton

afoton

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 179 posts
  • LocationHovet, Norway
  • Edit my pics?:No

Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:24

I have mixed feelings for this lens. Stopped down its great. Opened up, its soft and dot-shaped lights (like stars) looks horrible. So it doesnt works for asto-usage.

Because of the bigger aperture, this lens has been my winter-28mm. And the AIS 28mm/2.8 with its close-up capabilities, has been my summer -28mm

#29 simato73

simato73

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 1,635 posts
  • LocationBollington, Cheshire
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 20 April 2012 - 16:34

Yes, coma is pretty terrible, as it is in the 35/1.4 and probably others I don't know.
For the rest it is a great little lens, I agree with the numerous comments on its peculiar "drawing" capabilities.
Simone

#30 davepaterson

davepaterson

    Ex-photographer

  • Life Member
  • 2,981 posts
  • LocationKillin, Scotland
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 20 April 2012 - 19:35

I agree with everything positive which has been said about this lens; a little soft at f2, sharp by 2.8 and bitingly sharp and detailed from there up to f8 at least with f11 quite ok and 16 still just usable.
Dave Paterson

#31 Airee

Airee

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 2,072 posts
  • LocationLille
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 09 October 2013 - 04:00

Same here. The muddy corners at f/2 somewhat limit the usefulness at that aperture (good for close-ups though). From 2.8, sharpness is OK for most usages, but at 5.6, the extreme corners remain mushy (with a rather sharp transition from sharp to mushy by the way). Flare resistance is indeed amazing and does solve the troubles encountered when shooting organs in churches (against bright windows). Distortion is noticeable and often needs correction (for my favourite subjects) in post processing. No real problem (on a trip I'd use rawtherapee as a portable app on a USB key for that purpose).

 

Night shots are OK from f/4 and stopping down further. At f/2, the coma is terrible and spot lights tend to 'bleed'.

 

For available (i.e. low) light shooting, this is not necessarily the best lens: the conjuction of relatively low contrast wide open, plus sensor noise due to high ISO, tends to provide so-so images. For such kind of usage, I'd rather recommend such lenses as Zeiss 35/2 (I have not experienced the 28/2 so far), delivering high contrast and decent corners even wide open. Paradoxically it is in bright settings that the fast 28/2 Nikkor shines. An interesting study would be to look where the optimum lies: assuming that speed is set to the slowest possible given the circumstances, and that DOF does not matter (flat subject), which ISO/f-stop combination would deliver maximum IQ? no scientific answer is expected since IQ is largely subjective and camera-dependent, but test for yourself.

 

Again, I'd complain about the difficulty to properly focus WA with current FF bodies. I am currently using the D800 and, in darker scenes, neither the viewfinder nor the AF confirmation dot will provide sufficient accuracy; only LV would but that's really cumbersome. Fortunately the infinite stop remains usable :)


Edited by Airy, 03 December 2013 - 21:02 .


#32 FrankF

FrankF

    project manager

  • Life Member
  • 1,930 posts
  • LocationBonn
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 09 October 2013 - 07:34

I used the 2.0/28mm as an Aid version of the full metal "berg-und-tal"

 

290766851_b37494d0c0_o.jpg

 

294684503_e7b59ea483_o.jpg

 

It is a great formula like the 1.8/85mm or the famous 2.0/50mm


Most businesses have a good idea of who they are and what they want to become, but only a faint idea of how they can communicate their identity and services to their future customers. With custom tailored concepts photography and text I provide this connection effectively. My company: http://fotokontext.de/

 

Older photos selected & sorted: http://www.flickr.co...otos/ngudu/sets





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Receive a FREE CAMERA BAG from Think Tank Photo


An appeal to all Fotozones visitors: please help me to keep this site going by starting your gear purchases using any one of the affiliate links shown below:

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama.com | thinkTank Photo | DigitalRev.com | OWC | B&H or Donate via PayPal

Starting your shopping here doesn't cost you anything more, but by using the links above (or any others found on the site) you are advising the affiliate that you support this website. This results in a small commission that helps with the running costs. If your preferred outlet isn't among those listed above you can also support the site by making a donation of any amount via PayPal (no PayPal account required). Any donation will be most appreciated.