Nikon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G DX AF-S
Posted 23 October 2007 - 11:32
Clicking on an ad just once a day will help me tremendously with financing this site.
You can also support the site by buying your gear from the affiliate advertisers below (use these links):
Posted 10 May 2008 - 17:51
Many user complaining about the vignette and distortion, but there's not a problem from me, but my main complain is the CA and fringing when using this lens for landscape. It's still there even i stop down to f/16.
Many people too considering about the plastic mount, but since I have several prime lens and zoom, I change lenses quiet often, i could change 2-3 lenses just for a single scenery and have no problem with the mount, but finally the AF-S motor died on me in my last visit to Japan (last February) the temp is below 0 degree Celsius, and the focus is start squeaking and stop focusing. It cost me around $50 to replace the AFS motor . So, lesson taken, is not a great working horse, But 18-135 is truly really nice light travel lens with a reasonable price.
Posted 28 May 2008 - 13:51
It is too expensive for an entry level lens and two crappy for a higher level lens. It makes an adequate lightweight back up lens, there if you need it but hopefully you never will.
It will only make you happy twice...the day you buy it and the day you sell it.
Posted 05 May 2010 - 13:16
Posted 14 February 2014 - 18:31
This lens is definately sharp enough for 12-16MP cameras (best in the lower focal-lenghts), but it is to slow, lacks VR and desperately needs it!
So for photography without a tripod, the upper focal-lenght range is unusable in anything but direct sunlight.
Thus the 18-55mm VR is the logical and better choice.
In addition, I think this lens is way too big to have a plastic mount.
Posted 10 March 2014 - 14:46
I bought a used Nikon 16-85 VR lens instead because it had VR and a metal lens mount. Even though it doesn't reach as far.
Posted 26 March 2014 - 11:52
I bought a 18 - 140 lens, a newer version of this. It is with VR and a metal lens mount.
It seems to be quite good even with my D7100. Best sharpness is on longer side of the lens.
Let's hope you make a new thread for this very lens.
D7100, D300, Nokia Pureview 808
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
An appeal to all Fotozones visitors: please help me to keep this site going by starting your gear purchases using any one of the affiliate links shown below:
Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama.com | thinkTank Photo | DigitalRev.com | OWC | B&H or Donate via PayPal