Jump to content




The above adverts really do help Fotozones. Please click on them if they are relevant to you. Not seeing them? Just exclude Fotozones from your ad blocker. Thanks!


Photo
- - - - -

Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

Poll: Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S (33 member(s) have cast votes)

Rate this lens

  1. 1 Star (appalling) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2 Stars (below acceptable) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 3 Stars (average) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. 4 Stars (above average) (3 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  5. Voted 5 Stars (outstanding) (30 votes [90.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 90.91%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Dallas

Dallas

    Fotozones Owner

  • Administrators
  • 18,167 posts
  • LocationDurban, South Africa
  • Edit my pics?:Yes

Posted 01 June 2011 - 11:22

If you have had the pleasure of using this lens, please let others know what you think of it. Please read the guidelines of this board before commenting as posts that do not conform to those guidelines may be deleted or moved to other threads without notice. This thread will be indexed on our Reviews page.

Should you decide to buy this lens please consider doing so via the links below as this will help to keep our site going:

Amazon.com

Posted Image

Clicking on an ad just once a day will help me tremendously with financing this site. 

You can also support the site by buying your gear from the affiliate advertisers below (use these links):

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama | B&HThinkTankPhoto | Digital REV | OWC 

Alternatively you can DONATE via PayPal (donor list)

 

Follow Me On: social-facebook-box-blue-icon.png social-twitter-box-blue-icon.png YouTube-icon.png google-icon.png 


#2 EL_guest

EL_guest

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 6,446 posts
  • Location_
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 01 June 2011 - 17:00

Simply outstanding, a worthy upgrade of the old workhorse 35/1.4 Ais
Very similar IQ to the new 24/1.4 AFS sharp contrasty and nice Bokeh.
AF is on the slow side for my liking, it's an ultra small SWM and a plastic gear box, only real drawback...

Edited by Erik Lund, 01 June 2011 - 20:31 .


#3 stenrasmussen

stenrasmussen

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 5,064 posts
  • LocationStavanger
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 01 June 2011 - 20:26

A biggish and slowish focusing lens but that's where the negatives end.
Lovely bokeh, contrasty and sharp. Quite excellent flare resistance but not perfect.
Here's a a couple of examples:

Attached Images

  • _SRP1349.jpg
  • 35Gat56.jpg

Machina fotografica necesse est

#4 palalaikka

palalaikka

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 1,042 posts
  • LocationOulu, Finland
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 16 July 2011 - 20:53

I find the IQ from this lens outstanding. Especially the 3D-look is something I have not been able to get from any other 35mm lens I have used (17-35/2.8, 16-35/4, 35/2, 24-120/4, 35/1.8 DX). Mine seems to live at f/2, but IQ at f/1.4 is nearly identical.

What I don't like is the weight of the lens, but once one sees the pictures this minor negative side is soon forgotten.
AF is not super fast, but I haven't missed any shots because of it. Tracking of moving subjects (running children) works without any problems.

I earlier used 35/2 AF-D. Even though 35/1.4 AF-S costs ~5 times of 35/2 AF-D, there is so big difference in IQ that I find the high price justified.

f/2.8:
02_06_2011_12_29_05_DSC_5074.jpg

f/2:
04_07_2011_13_21_42_DSC_6343.jpg

f/2:
04_07_2011_18_57_51_DSC_6355.jpg

f/2.8:
04_07_2011_20_02_37_DSC_6379.jpg

f/1.7:
21_06_2011_21_15_15_DSC_5723.jpg

f/2:
24_06_2011_19_43_24_DSC_5833.jpg

f/2:
28_05_2011_16_19_29_DSC_4987.jpg

Edited by palalaikka, 17 July 2011 - 09:18 .


#5 Colin-M

Colin-M

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 1,704 posts
  • LocationBristol, UK
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 18 January 2012 - 19:51

I have rented this lens for some indoors events where the light levels will be low.
It's the first time I've used a 35mm prime, so am slowly getting the hang of it on my D300.

This shot was taken using f2.5 @ 1/6th, whilst braced against a tree trunk:

Posted Image

So far I would say I am having to get used to focussing more carefully. My other initial impression is that, whilst the options for subject isolation are impressive @ f1.4, the lens shows a lot of purple fringing round point sources when wide open. Have been experimenting with removing this in PP.

Here's an example before correction:

Posted Image

..and here, after using 50% Axial Colour Abberation correction in Capture NX2

Posted Image
Colin
--------------------------------
http://www.pbase.com/celidh

#6 Jan Anne

Jan Anne

    Noob

  • Life Member
  • 3,829 posts
  • LocationAmsterdam
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 06 August 2012 - 23:14

I absolutely adore this lens, very sharp wide-open and the way it draws the image is stunning (as it was designed to do). It balances perfectly on the D800/E.

All images wide-open on the D800E
Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Only the mediocre are always at their best....

My Flickr


#7 kristian skeie

kristian skeie

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 344 posts

Posted 08 December 2012 - 11:26

My favourite go to lens, I use it loads for reportage work. Most of the photos from my project in Bosnia is with the 35 f1.4s, including this picture.

Attached Images

  • coffin.jpg

Edited by kskeie, 08 December 2012 - 18:59 .

  • Airee likes this

#8 kristian skeie

kristian skeie

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 344 posts

Posted 08 December 2012 - 11:28

Sorry, here is a link to my Bosnia project!

#9 pluton

pluton

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 700 posts
  • LocationSanta Monica, CA USA
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 19 March 2013 - 19:20

This lens does not produce 'sharper' or more detailed lmages on my [now former]D3 and [current]D800(E) than my Zeiss ZF35/2, but it's imaging 'style' has it's own unique and pleasant character. It is one of the few Nikon AF lenses that is a pleasure to operate for manual focus, both because of the brighter finder it yields, and the mechanical focus action being well executed. Also, it's very good in the close up range(1:10, 1:15, etc) and seems to have a relatively flat field as well.
Keith B.

#10 Dan Brown

Dan Brown

    Advanced Member

  • Subscriber
  • 201 posts
  • LocationFort Worth
  • Edit my pics?:No

Posted 08 November 2013 - 05:42

Very fine lens, it's my low light champ for sure. Pricy, but worth it.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





The above adverts really do help Fotozones. Please click on them if they are relevant to you. Not seeing them? Just exclude Fotozones from your ad blocker. Thanks!


An appeal to all Fotozones visitors: please help me to keep this site going by starting your gear purchases using any one of the affiliate links shown below:

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama.com | thinkTank Photo | DigitalRev.com | OWC | B&H or Donate via PayPal

Starting your shopping here doesn't cost you anything more, but by using the links above (or any others found on the site) you are advising the affiliate that you support this website. This results in a small commission that helps with the running costs. If your preferred outlet isn't among those listed above you can also support the site by making a donation of any amount via PayPal (no PayPal account required). Any donation will be most appreciated.