Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC APO HSM


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

Poll: Rate this lens (3 member(s) have cast votes)

Rate this lens

  1. 1 Star - appalling (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2 Stars - below average (1 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  3. 3 Stars - average (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. 4 Stars - above average (1 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  5. 5 Stars - outstanding (1 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Dallas

Dallas

    Fotozones Owner

  • Administrators
  • 18,175 posts
  • LocationDurban, South Africa
  • Edit my pics?:Yes

Posted 06 September 2010 - 18:19

If you have used this lens, please share your experiences with the community by posting about them as a reply to this topic. This topic will be indexed on our "Other Lenses" page. You may post sample images taken with the lens.

Please don't ask questions pertaining to the lens on this thread, rather ask in the Lenses board.

Support Fotozones:  

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama | B&HThinkTankPhoto | Digital REV | OWC 

Alternatively you can DONATE via PayPal (donor list)

 

Follow Me On: social-facebook-box-blue-icon.png social-twitter-box-blue-icon.png YouTube-icon.png google-icon.png 


#2 davidzvi

davidzvi

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts
  • LocationMass

Posted 30 October 2010 - 02:00

Loved the lens when I shot DX, only sold it when I got my D700.  The range, size, and weight were great when carrying two bodies for events.  The 24-70 and 70-200 I have now are great but heavy (also replaced my Nikon 17-55).

I would have rated it outstanding but is anything really perfect?  And while HSM is fast I think AF-S is a little faster.  Some have said it needs OS but I'm not sure it really needs it. 

Posted Image
David Zvi
http://www.blueberryphoto.com/

Nikon and Fuji

#3 Dan Brown

Dan Brown

    Advanced Member

  • Subscriber
  • 201 posts
  • LocationFort Worth
  • Edit my pics?:No

Posted 08 November 2013 - 05:53

I owned the first version on this lens and used it with a D200. Lateral chromatic aberrations degraded far too many images. I gave it a two because it was solid and could render sharp images, but the long end was weak.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Receive a FREE CAMERA BAG from Think Tank Photo


An appeal to all Fotozones visitors: please help me to keep this site going by starting your gear purchases using any one of the affiliate links shown below:

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama.com | thinkTank Photo | DigitalRev.com | OWC | B&H or Donate via PayPal

Starting your shopping here doesn't cost you anything more, but by using the links above (or any others found on the site) you are advising the affiliate that you support this website. This results in a small commission that helps with the running costs. If your preferred outlet isn't among those listed above you can also support the site by making a donation of any amount via PayPal (no PayPal account required). Any donation will be most appreciated.