Nikon AF-S Teleconverter TC-20E II
Posted 06 December 2009 - 12:20
Please don't ask questions abiut this item in this thread, rather open a new thread in the appropriate board.
Posted 06 December 2009 - 14:33
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
My latest book: The AfterShot Survival Guide
sRGB clipping sucks and Adobe RGB is just as bad Still no clue how to take decent pictures though, see afximages.com ;-(
Posted 06 December 2009 - 14:49
Posted 06 December 2009 - 17:06
Posted 04 May 2011 - 17:32
It produces low quality images even if closed 2-3 stops.
Not recommended at all on this lens.
Posted 09 January 2012 - 21:00
Posted 11 May 2013 - 09:32
I had this, and sold it quickly. Simply cropping (and/or resizing) the image from the naked lens gives better results.
The TC-20E III is much better. However, if you're after no visible degradation of quality, 1.4x is the furthest you should go.
But, in that case: also carrying a cheap, light, high resolution DX-camera (e.g. a Nikon D3200 with its 24MP) will do a much better job than any teleconverter! (and give 1.5x!)
So all in all, TC's are a waste of money.
Posted 11 May 2013 - 12:17
Posted 11 May 2013 - 17:58
Founder of MacroStop.com, the All-Music Guide, All-Movie Guide, All-Game Guide, ClassicPosters.com, SpiritGrooves.net, and other sites.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
An appeal to all Fotozones visitors: please help me to keep this site going by starting your gear purchases using any one of the affiliate links shown below:
Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama.com | thinkTank Photo | DigitalRev.com | OWC | B&H or Donate via PayPal