Jump to content




The above adverts really do help Fotozones. Please click on them if they are relevant to you. Not seeing them? Just exclude Fotozones from your ad blocker. Thanks!


Photo
- - - - -

Nikon AF Fisheye-Nikkor 16mm f/2.8D


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

Poll: Rate this lens (30 member(s) have cast votes)

Rate this lens

  1. 1 Star (appalling) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2 Stars (below average) (1 votes [3.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.33%

  3. 3 Stars (average) (3 votes [10.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  4. 4 Stars (above average) (15 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  5. 5 Stars (outstanding) (11 votes [36.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Dallas

Dallas

    Fotozones Owner

  • Administrators
  • 18,169 posts
  • LocationDurban, South Africa
  • Edit my pics?:Yes

Posted 06 December 2009 - 12:04

Have you used this lens? If so, let others know what you thought about it by summarising your experiences as a reply to this thread.

Please keep all comments on topic.

Clicking on an ad just once a day will help me tremendously with financing this site. 

You can also support the site by buying your gear from the affiliate advertisers below (use these links):

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama | B&HThinkTankPhoto | Digital REV | OWC 

Alternatively you can DONATE via PayPal (donor list)

 

Follow Me On: social-facebook-box-blue-icon.png social-twitter-box-blue-icon.png YouTube-icon.png google-icon.png 


#2 Ann

Ann

    Professional Photographer

  • Life Member
  • 10,160 posts
  • LocationNew York State
  • Edit my pics?:No

Posted 06 December 2009 - 15:27

I have it and have been delighted with it.

It is remarkably small and light but performs brilliantly. (It even netted me a POTW!)

You can use the Hemi Photoshop plug-in to "de-Fish" images if you want to and thus avoid making people near the edge of the shot visually gain 200lbs (as they do if you photograph a scene like that with regular rectilinear wide-angle lens like the 14 - 24 mm).

#3 openwave

openwave
  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 13 March 2010 - 13:22

It's a very fun lens, and it's daaaamn sharp.  use it a lot for my concert photography w/ my D700.

#4 Alan7140

Alan7140

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 5,623 posts
  • LocationTasmania, Australia
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 13 March 2010 - 13:45

I've had it for a couple of years (replacing the 10.5 when I moved to FX from DX).

I always carry it in my bag or pack, and use it constantly. Can't think of the last time I went on a shoot and didn't use it, in fact.

#5 helioer

helioer

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 671 posts
  • LocationHelsinki

Posted 13 March 2010 - 14:09

I have had this lens ever since I purchased my D3. It is well-built and sharp. No plastic parts in the lens body.

I have the 10.5 for DX bodies as well so one fisheye is always in the bag wherever I go.

I have the Hemi plugin for Photoshop for the situations where "a fishy look" is not desired. It works reasonably well in controlled situations (i.e. one needs to figure out where to put all horizontal or parallel lines when composing the picture).

Erkki

D3s, D3, D200, D70
FX: Nikon 14-24/2.8G, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.8G, 70-200/2.8G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 60/2.8D+105/2.8D micro, 85/1.4D, 16/2.8D, 50/1.4G, 500/8 reflex C, Sigma 8/3.5 EX, 12-24 EX, 150/2.8 OS EX...
TC: TC-14 E II, TC-17 E II, TC-20 E III
DX: 10.5/2.8, 18-70, 18-200
4*SB800's, R1C1 kit with 3*SB-R200, YN-622 kit (TX+4*RC)...


#6 zoomer200400

zoomer200400

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 780 posts
  • LocationUtah

Posted 13 March 2010 - 15:33

Built like a tank.  Not a big user in my bag (feel ashamed from above comments that its not).  Lens cap needs to be replaced with a lenscoat Hoodie.

Attached Images

  • Fishy_Tulips.jpg


#7 gsandberg

gsandberg

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 13 March 2010 - 16:59

I have had one for ages, even added a coupling prong for my pre 1977 bodies.
I chose the af-d version over the ai-s only for the matrix metering CPU, the AF feature seems rather useless to me.
Its image quality beats the 6 2.8 fish-eye hands-down.
(I admit I have not been able to compare the two, for lack of availablility, grin)
Regards, Gilbert

#8 PatrickO

PatrickO

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 584 posts
  • LocationLeeds

Posted 13 March 2010 - 20:00

Very sharp, well made, small and surprisingly useful. I have the AFD version, and this thread has reminded me to get it out more often  :)

Here's one where I tried to manage the horizontals...

Posted Image

and a crop of the boat....

Posted Image

#9 fks

fks

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 08 May 2010 - 00:36

i bought mine after hearing the rumors of FX. it was one of the first lenses i tried out when i got my D3. as the others have stated, it's sharp with good contrast. i haven't used it as much as i would like to because i haven't mastered wide angle (still!) and the fisheye distortion. but it is fun on those instances that i have used it.

one piece of advice: watch out for your feet, the FOV is so wide that you can accidentally photograph them.

ricky

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image


#10 Ann

Ann

    Professional Photographer

  • Life Member
  • 10,160 posts
  • LocationNew York State
  • Edit my pics?:No

Posted 08 May 2010 - 00:43

Zoomer mentioned that

Lens cap needs to be replaced with a lenscoat Hoodie.


The provided lens cap does slip-off rather easily but lining it with self-stick velvet (the kind that is sold for replacing light-trapping in film cameras) firms up the fit and I haven't lost mine …… YET ……!

#11 Scott Murphy

Scott Murphy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 165 posts
  • LocationPensacola, FL
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 01 January 2011 - 02:26

I don't have the D version, instead I have the manual focus AIS version. But this lens never disappoints!

Posted Image

“Sometimes I do get to places just when God's ready to have somebody click the shutter.”

 

- Ansel Adams


#12 mshi

mshi

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 133 posts

Posted 01 January 2011 - 02:38

Amazing ulrawide lens with excellent center sharpness and contrast, though a little soft at corners. I really love it. I am selling mine on FM 's trading post: http://www.fredmiran...m/topic/968502/

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image









#13 marek

marek

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 784 posts
  • LocationWarszawa

Posted 01 January 2011 - 07:42

I found a well priced one on KEH and it's waiting to replace the 10.5mm when I move to FX. Currently seeing use on an FE2. Like all fisheyes it's difficult to use well. ie composition not technically.

@stm: strange, my plastic cap stays on tight on my AIS version. Guess it's manufacturing tolerances.

@mshi: love the first three. great use of a fisheye where the distortion adds to the composition and not just novelty effect.


marek

#14 Markdphotoguy

Markdphotoguy
  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • LocationOttawa

Posted 14 January 2011 - 02:33

Always been a favorite of mine. Very sharp and contrasty and very useful. Like all fisheyes the look can get old after a while, the main reason why I don't own the lens. I work in a camera store and I borrow the lens when I need it and never not once has it failed to disappoint. If you will use the lens more than a few times a year for what you do pick one up otherwise maybe rent it from time to time.
www.flickr.com/markdphotoguy

#15 pluton

pluton

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 700 posts
  • LocationSanta Monica, CA USA
  • Edit my pics?:Ask Me

Posted 29 July 2011 - 15:14

I purchased a new copy of this lens as a potential replacement for my 16/2.8 AiS. In my observation my sample of this lens was optically superior to my 16/2.8 AiS...with one caveat(see below). Unfortunately, when I operated the manual focus ring on the brand new AF 16/2.8D, the image in the finder noticeably juddered from side to side. Unacceptable. This effect did not occur when using AF, only manual focus. I'll examine another copy at some point, and simultaneously hope that Zeiss will offer a FF Fisheye in the future.
Keith B.

#16 ALE

ALE

    Advanced Member

  • Life Member
  • 45 posts

Posted 06 December 2011 - 19:27

Absolute razorsharp lens. Fun to work with. Some examples from my Iceland trip 2011:

1) Posted Image

2) Posted Image

3) Posted Image

4) Posted Image

5) Posted Image

Cheers,



ALE




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





The above adverts really do help Fotozones. Please click on them if they are relevant to you. Not seeing them? Just exclude Fotozones from your ad blocker. Thanks!


An appeal to all Fotozones visitors: please help me to keep this site going by starting your gear purchases using any one of the affiliate links shown below:

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama.com | thinkTank Photo | DigitalRev.com | OWC | B&H or Donate via PayPal

Starting your shopping here doesn't cost you anything more, but by using the links above (or any others found on the site) you are advising the affiliate that you support this website. This results in a small commission that helps with the running costs. If your preferred outlet isn't among those listed above you can also support the site by making a donation of any amount via PayPal (no PayPal account required). Any donation will be most appreciated.