Jump to content




The above adverts really do help Fotozones. Please click on them if they are relevant to you. Not seeing them? Just exclude Fotozones from your ad blocker. Thanks!


Photo
- - - - -

Tokina AT-X 165 PRO DX 16-50mm f/2.8


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

Poll: Rate this lens (5 member(s) have cast votes)

Rate this lens

  1. 1 Star (appalling) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2 Stars (below par) (1 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  3. 3 Stars (average) (1 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  4. 4 Stars (above average) (3 votes [60.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 60.00%

  5. 5 Stars (outstanding) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Dallas

Dallas

    Fotozones Owner

  • Administrators
  • 18,167 posts
  • LocationDurban, South Africa
  • Edit my pics?:Yes

Posted 15 May 2009 - 18:42

Please post your experiences with this lens here. This topic will be indexed on our Equipment pages.

Posted Image

Clicking on an ad just once a day will help me tremendously with financing this site. 

You can also support the site by buying your gear from the affiliate advertisers below (use these links):

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama | B&HThinkTankPhoto | Digital REV | OWC 

Alternatively you can DONATE via PayPal (donor list)

 

Follow Me On: social-facebook-box-blue-icon.png social-twitter-box-blue-icon.png YouTube-icon.png google-icon.png 


#2 kanzlr

kanzlr

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 18 June 2009 - 11:07

The sample I had went back after a few hours.

at 16mm it was pretty good, but at 50mm it was unusable at f2.8, ok at f4 and good at f5.6.
It was not a matter of AF, because i did test shots where even the sharpest point was hazy.

#3 RKPhotog

RKPhotog

    Grand Potentate

  • Life Member
  • 2,014 posts
  • LocationUpstate NY

Posted 08 November 2011 - 15:07

My experience was the opposite. I got massive CA at 16mm which needed F8 to bring down to a reasonable level. Never very sharp at 16mm. Move beyond 16mm and things get better. So for me it is an 18-50mm lens. The lens hood is pretty flimsy and when reversed can easily end up slipping down the barrel. Better to get the Nikon hood. Otherwise it is a fine performer and better built than some Nikkors I've seen lately.
Bob
Bob

#4 stdon

stdon

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts

Posted 03 December 2011 - 10:59

I bought probably the second one on B&H's shelve and for me it was the best alternative I found for a DX lens in this focal length spectrum. I liked the results better than the Nikkor 17/55 or other brands that I tried. Wide and wide didn't find barrel distortion, vignetting or CA to be any worse than the other lenses and better than most with any problems easily corrected in LR. This lens has a robust build quality and on my D1X the colors, contrast and sharpness very pleasing. Wide open this lens was very usable and by f4 was very nice +1. This is the only DX lens I every bought and 3 years ago when I went to a D700 I no longer needed a wide DX lens so I soled it to a friend who values it highly. Now that I also have a D7000 I may borrow it and see how it is on this body.

#5 RH-Image.nl

RH-Image.nl
  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • LocationHolland
  • Edit my pics?:Yes

Posted 07 December 2011 - 16:26

I love this lens.... The build quality is excellent. However wide open the lens show some CA. That's why I shoot mostly at F4 and beyond. Center sharpness is pretty good. And most of the time I also shoot at black and white so it isn't visible.

Posted Image

Posted Image
www.rh-image.nl




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Receive a FREE CAMERA BAG from Think Tank Photo


An appeal to all Fotozones visitors: please help me to keep this site going by starting your gear purchases using any one of the affiliate links shown below:

Amazon.com | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Adorama.com | thinkTank Photo | DigitalRev.com | OWC | B&H or Donate via PayPal

Starting your shopping here doesn't cost you anything more, but by using the links above (or any others found on the site) you are advising the affiliate that you support this website. This results in a small commission that helps with the running costs. If your preferred outlet isn't among those listed above you can also support the site by making a donation of any amount via PayPal (no PayPal account required). Any donation will be most appreciated.